med-mastodon.com is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Medical community on Mastodon

Administered by:

Server stats:

364
active users

#nvme

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Adrianna Tan<p>Excellent post on building a mini NAS</p><p><a href="https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2025/mini-nases-marry-nvme-intels-efficient-chip" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">jeffgeerling.com/blog/2025/min</span><span class="invisible">i-nases-marry-nvme-intels-efficient-chip</span></a></p><p><a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/NVME" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NVME</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/NAS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NAS</span></a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/DIY" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>DIY</span></a></p>
gyptazy<p>Why you should use NFSv4 over NFSv3 in your Proxmox cluster - the difference is huge!</p><p>And if NFS has still too high latencies for you, my upcoming post of NVMe-oF (TCP) with SPDK will solve your issues.</p><p>Link: <a href="https://gyptazy.com/nfsv3-vs-nfsv4-storage-on-proxmox-the-latency-clash-that-reveals-more-than-you-think/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">gyptazy.com/nfsv3-vs-nfsv4-sto</span><span class="invisible">rage-on-proxmox-the-latency-clash-that-reveals-more-than-you-think/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/proxmox" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>proxmox</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/nfs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>nfs</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/storage" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>storage</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/homelab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>homelab</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/nfs3" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>nfs3</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/nfs4" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>nfs4</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/pnfs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pnfs</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/nvmeof" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>nvmeof</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/nvme" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>nvme</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/latency" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>latency</span></a></p>
gyptazy<p>Not even bad the latency (this is just about latency, not overall bandwidth which reaches the full 4.9Gbit via 2x 2.5Gbit links).</p><p>Taken inside a Debian VM running on a Proxmox node connected to the storage:</p><p>GMKTec G9 NAS<br>2x 2.5Gbit<br>NFS 4.2 (with pNFS)<br>2x WD Back SN7100 NVMe<br>Mirror mode ZFS</p><p>While this are already pretty awesome latencies, let's see how it performs with SPDK and NVMe-oF (TCP). </p><p><a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/homelab" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>homelab</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/proxmox" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>proxmox</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/storage" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>storage</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/zfs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>zfs</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/gmktec" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>gmktec</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/gmktecg9" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>gmktecg9</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/latency" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>latency</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/freebsd" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>freebsd</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/NFS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NFS</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/SPDK" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>SPDK</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/NVMe" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NVMe</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.gyptazy.com/tags/NVMEoF" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NVMEoF</span></a></p>
VoidZeroOne :tranarchy_a_genderqueer: :v_trans: :v_pan:<p>" First the "SATA" connection has no erase feature and SATA is most often used for disk drives anyway (though some large capacity enterprise HDD have a secure erase button to be used one time before disposal)." *</p><p>I can't with some people.</p><p>PSA: stop doing dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sdX</p><p>use (as root)<br>hdparm --user-master u --security-erase-enhanced 4HFgWWDzWpRC6 /dev/sdX</p><p>hdparm --user-master u --security-erase 4HFgWWDzWpRC6 /dev/sdX</p><p>or if you are on a NVME drive<br>nvme sanitize /dev/nvmeX -a start-crypto-erase</p><p>Also please you all make sure that you know what you are talking about before you make a fool out of yourself in a public space</p><p>Ref: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_ATA#HDD_passwords_and_security" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel</span><span class="invisible">_ATA#HDD_passwords_and_security</span></a></p><p>*Context: secure erase on SSD drives via SATA interface.</p><p><a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>linux</span></a> <a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/ssd" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ssd</span></a> <a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/sata" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>sata</span></a> <a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/secureerase" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>secureerase</span></a> <a href="https://tech.lgbt/tags/nvme" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>nvme</span></a></p>
Thomas<p><strong>Was haltet ihr vom Beelink ME Mini NAS mit 6 NVMe-Slots und bis zu 24 TB?</strong></p><p><br>Beelink bringt mit dem ME Mini ein kompaktes NAS auf den Markt, das bis zu sechs NVMe-SSDs (insgesamt 24 TB) aufnehmen kann. Es kommt mit 12 GB RAM, Intel N150 Prozessor und unterstützt verschiedene Betriebssysteme wie Windows, Proxmox und Linux. Neben zwei schnellen 2,5 Gbit/s Ethernet-Ports gibt es auch WiFi 6, Bluetooth 5.2 und mehrere USB-Anschlüsse.</p><p>Mich interessiert eure Meinung:<br>- Ist das ME Mini für euch als Selbsthoster oder Bastler interessant?<br>- Gibt es Alternativen, die ihr bevorzugen würdet?</p> <p>Quelle: notebookcheck.com/beelink-me-mini-nas-mit-bis-zu-24tb-und-6-ssd-slots-jetzt-vorbestellbar.1014161.0.html</p><p><a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=Beelink" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Beelink</span></a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=NAS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NAS</span></a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=NVMe" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NVMe</span></a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=Selfhosting" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Selfhosting</span></a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Linux</span></a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=Proxmox" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Proxmox</span></a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=MiniPC" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MiniPC</span></a> <a href="https://anonsys.net/search?tag=Frage" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Frage</span></a></p>
framboise314<p>Montage en cours du Pironman 5 Max avec un <a href="https://mast.eu.org/tags/RaspberryPi5" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RaspberryPi5</span></a> 8 Go + 2 SSD NVMe Lexar de 256 Go.<br>Merci à @SunFounder &amp; @Kubii_fr pour le soutien 🙏<br>Ça promet ! 👀</p><p>📷 <a href="https://mast.eu.org/tags/Framboise314" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Framboise314</span></a> <a href="https://mast.eu.org/tags/NVMe" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>NVMe</span></a> <a href="https://mast.eu.org/tags/RAID" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>RAID</span></a> <a href="https://mast.eu.org/tags/Maker" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Maker</span></a></p>

You could use an M2 SSD in a PCIe adapter instead of a dedicated M2 slot on the motherboard

“If you’ve already stuffed the slots in your motherboard full of PCIe SSDs, you might be wondering what’s the best way to add more. While you could buy larger capacities and swap them out, several manufacturers make PCIe add-in cards that can add on ...continues

See gadgeteer.co.za/you-could-use-

Close-up of an ASUS PCIe 5.0 M.2 expansion card with a sleek black heatsink and gold connectors, showcased on a light background.
GadgeteerZA · You could use an M2 SSD in a PCIe adapter instead of a dedicated M2 slot on the motherboard“If you've already stuffed the slots in your motherboard full of PCIe SSDs, you might be wondering what's the best way to add more. While you could buy larger

Several weeks ago I pre-ordered a 1TB NVMe drive from NewEgg as it was on sale for $40 instead of the regular price of $80. It finally shipped out yesterday, so I'm waiting for it to arrive.

This morning, I get this email from the company that makes the NVMe drive.

Dear Customer,

We would like to take this opportunity to sincerely thank you for your trust and support. To show our appreciation, we have upgraded your NVMe order from 1TB to 2TB for free!

Shocked to see this as it just doesn't happen much in todays world like it once used to.

#NVMe#Drive#NewEgg

#Mac nerds - for a #MacbookAir, what would be the most ergonomically convenient external storage thing to do? Yes I know I can get a short USBC cable and an external case for an #NVME drive. Already have that. But is there a.. thing? I dunno. Like a good way to strap something up on the side, or across the back or whatever, that doesn't involve a fucking appendage dangling off it? I get enough of that looking in the god damned mirror after a shower. Looking for an "aesthetic" solution.

I am running #PhotoPrism on a Raspberry Pi 5 with 8GB of RAM, using a 1TB SSD as the main and only drive, using the Pimoroni NVMe Base.

So far, I could not properly measure the performance, because I don’t know how to do it, but I am satisfied! Yet, this is definitely not a future-proof solution, since I need way more storage: I still haven’t imported most of my pictures there, and I need to prepare for plenty more to come.

The simplest (yet quite pricey, 261£) option would be to get a Pimoroni NVMe Duo and maximize it with a total of 4TB NVMe SSDs.

I think this is not optimal, though, and probably I could be spending all that money much better… Do you have any advice?

The thing about hosting a personal media gallery is that it requires a lot of resources when indexing the pictures (so only when you add new ones), then it’s super light—correct me if I am wrong, @photoprism. Hence, I’m thinking the best would be an extensible solution where I can add many HDDs and SSDs, without being forced to pump up the other specs too. I would probably be using just one NVMe SSD for the software and the database, and then save everything else in high-performance HDDs, since they are getting cheap and I can get much more storage with less money—of course I am performing a daily backup off-site, as they are more likely to fail, too.

If I am 100% sure that whatever I end up choosing will be solid for many years to come, I am willing to consider spending a bit more on it.

shop.pimoroni.comNVMe Base for Raspberry Pi 5

my favorite feature of my #NVME #zfs pool is that i can scrub the whole fscker in minutes 😂 go go gadget `zpool scrub cascade`

g-d i love zfs. this pool is on my creative #macOS workstation so it's photography, video, and web sites, as well as where my DEVONthink databases and Obsidian vaults live. cascade/people/zemory/research and /notes benefit a lot from being on such fast storage and there are some caveats but nothing that should discourage anyone that needs reliable self-healing storage.