The Complex Landscape of Voter Economics and Accountability in the Post-COVID Era
By: Cliff Potts, WPS News, Editor-in-Chief
Baybay City | January 10, 2025
As Donald Trump prepares to take the oath of office on January 20, 2025, following his victory in the November 2024 election, understanding the intricate relationship between economic hardship and voter perceptions is more crucial than ever. This dynamic offers insights into electoral decisions and the narratives shaping public opinion.
Leading up to the pandemic, the United States experienced an economic upswing, largely celebrated by Trump supporters. The administration’s focus on job creation, tax cuts, and deregulation led to rising median household incomes and historically low poverty rates. These achievements set high expectations, especially among voters without college degrees, who experienced real gains during these years.
However, this landscape shifted dramatically in early 2020 with the onset of COVID-19. Unprecedented job losses and economic instability marked a crisis no administration anticipated. By January 2021, unemployment soared, thrusting the nation into a downturn, exacerbated by supply chain disruptions. For many Trump voters, this sudden shift indelibly impacted their economic reality.
During President Biden’s term, new narratives emerged. While some economic sectors recovered, rising inflation—fueled by supply chain issues and geopolitical tensions like the Russian invasion of Ukraine—compounded the challenges. Notably, inflation rates were higher outside the USA, highlighting the global nature of the post-COVID inflation spike, caused by too much money chasing too few goods. Many Americans, including Trump voters, redirected frustrations toward the administration, often oversimplifying these dynamics and blaming current leadership without acknowledging inherited circumstances or global influences.
Trump’s successful 2024 campaign effectively capitalized on portraying the Biden administration as ineffective amid economic challenges. By tapping into existing frustrations within his base, Trump leveraged the early achievements of his first term against the chaos of the pandemic to gain deeper voter support. Economic messaging remained vital, especially for a base feeling left behind in a shifting economy.
Accountability remains a contentious issue. Is it fair to hold leaders responsible for economic consequences beyond their control? With job losses from lockdowns and a strained global economy, voters may focus more on immediate circumstances than the complex web of causes.
Ultimately, reflections on economic outcomes during and post-Trump’s first presidency offer significant lessons as he prepares to lead again. As we enter this new administration, the interplay of economic realities and narratives will influence both voter decisions and trust in leadership. The coming years will be pivotal for both electoral outcomes and public trust in leadership amid challenging economic realities.
WPS News remains committed to examining these vital discussions and will not allow the new Trump administration to rewrite history in its own image – we have had enough of that. As we look towards the future of our nation’s political and economic landscape, understanding these dynamics remains essential.
Yonhap Infomax News
With Biden in charge, your 401k is in good hands. No crashes, just steady progress. 
Recovery drags for YEARS.
How post-2008 deregulation saved the economy: TradingEconomics
