Recent searches
Search options
Administered by:
The
@nytimes.com
likes to insist it has no point of view, that it is just "doing journalism," and criticism is meant to intimidate independent reporting, as publisher A.G. Sulzberger says here. 1/ https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/new-york-times-publisher-g-sulzberger-our-industry-needs-think-bigger
Well, it wasn't true then and it isn't true now, the paper has a viewpoint and it wraps itself in the mantle of neutrality again and again. Case in point. The homophobia at the Times was legendary. But of course, they were just reporting the straight facts. 2/ https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/10/the-new-york-times-discovered-gay-people-in-1987.html
And dear reader, they are still at it. When you're the
@nytimes.com
you never have to say you're sorry. end/ https://glaad.org/new-york-times-inaccurate-coverage-transgender-people-being-weaponized-against-transgender/
@gregggonsalves 
"...But of course, they were just reporting the straight facts..."
@gregggonsalves sorry, third generation money shithead says what?
He's an ass.