https://hamishcampbell.com/live-at-c-base-a-fluffy-fediverse-conference/ You likely need a shovel to work on composting. Or if you want to continue with this kind of mess making then clearer naming the events for the minority they invite and host would help to make less mess, a few #NGO groups have started to do this like #FediForum and the #SWF now have less imperialistic language, which is at least is a little less blinded.
Conversations on Compost, Bridges, and the Future
A few recent conversations remind me: we’ve already done the work of building alternatives. Twenty years of grassroots tech, radical process, and messy social organizing. The trouble is, that soil has been hollowed out, scattered, exhausted, and composted into the #dotconsOur current mission isn’t to “start from scratch,” but to rebuild bridges, spread compost, and replenish the soil. That’s why I keep coming back to this moment, the bridging of the #openweb back into #mainstream […]
https://hamishcampbell.com/conversations-on-compost-bridges-and-the-future/
Kennt hier jemand noch die "Piazza Virtuale"[1; 2. Link ist eine SEHR spannende Doku]? Das war ein 100 tägiges, experimentelles TV-Programm im Jahre 1992, bei dem Benutzer via #Telefon, #Fax und #Computer das Programm selbst "mitgestalten" konnten.
Ein paar Jahre später (1995) gab es dann vom #SWF3 (heute @swr3) etwas Aehnliches. Das "SWR3 Nachtfieber"[2]. Veranstaltet wurden beide Projekte vom "PONTON European Media Art Lab"[3].
Ich war damals, genau zu dieser Zeit beim SWF als Telefontechniker angestellt, und hab mitgeholfen, das ganze Setup des Nachtfieber Studio aufzubauen. DAS war eine spannende Zeit! Alles neu, keiner hatte einen Plan, ob das wirklich funktionieren wird.
Sowohl Piazza als auch Nachtfieber waren ihrer Zeit weit voraus, und wurden damals nicht wirklich verstanden.
#Kunst #MedienKunst #Fernsehen #TV #SWF #SWR #Ponton
[1]
- https://www.scarabaeus.org/www.ponton.de/archive/archive_piazza.html
- https://video.hs-mainz.de/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=4c0ad45d-1725-4f8c-ace4-adf300e2fc63
[2]
- https://www.scarabaeus.org/www.ponton.de/archive/archive_swf.html
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BALzXYMb2i4
[3] http://web.archive.org/web/19980219150652/http://www.ponton.de/
Social Web Foundation talking about privacy and interoperability. Who do they partner with? Meta.
Nothing to see here. https://techpolicy.social/@mallory/114737793476373409
#SouthAfrica: government refuses to recognize #union because it is non-hierarchical and has no permanent office bearers
"We launched in Sep/2024 with a bold mission: to foster an #open, #decentralized, and #usercentric #socialweb. In just the few short months that remained in 2024, we made meaningful progress. Our participation at #W3C #TPAC and collaborations with major stakeholders like #Mastodon, #Ghost, and #Automattic have helped spark momentum for a healthier, more resilient online ecosystem.
Today we are proud to publish our 2024 #AnnualReport– the first of many."
#SWF
https://socialwebfoundation.org/2025/05/06/reflecting-on-our-first-year-the-social-web-foundations-2024-annual-report/
Steps Forward in Long-form Text
Some quick news about the Long-form Text project at the Social Web Foundation. After the publication of the draft FEP b2b8 ("Long-form Text"), the Social Web Foundation has been working with implementers to get more support for the Article data type, representing multi-paragraph text on the Fediverse. One of the big pain points has been how subscribers to long-form text from platforms like WordPress, WriteFreely, Plume and Ghost.org see the text in their microblogging platforms like […]https://socialwebfoundation.org/2025/05/01/steps-forward-in-long-form-text/
That too.
Here's a screenshot from another verifying that @reiver's robin.live -- as demo'ed yesterday at the #FediverseHouse developer meetup hosted by @socialwebfdn
-- ignores consent.
At a session I led at #FediForum last year there was talk about how unfortunate it is that we keep having blowups when developers ignore consent. As I pointed out, fediverse influencers with big platforms could help here by highlighting how many people in the fediverse value consent, and that there are some obvious steps to take to avoid a firestorm -- like, y'know, RESPECTING PEOPLE'S ALREADY-SET PREFERENCES.
But no. https://privacy.thenexus.today/consent-for-fediverse-developers/
Hello #Fediverse
just another urgent warning about
#threads #swf #socialwebfoundation :
„Meta now appears to be acknowledging that your DMs (on Threads, Instagram and Facebook) can be fed into its AI system and potentially redistributed. “
https://digitalcourage.social/@w7voa@journa.host/113996390182079195
#meta #facebook #instagram #ai
#zuckerberg #fascism #techfascism
@josemurilo There's certainly a lot to critique about #FreeOurFeeds but reducing it to "we're going to build another Relay so that Bluesky's 'fire exits' are real" is just silly. The overall approach they're taking is similar to #SWF: there's a lot of money potentially floating around the ecosystem but investment is currently low,; and, there's a lot of concern about one big player dominating (Meta for ActivityPub and Bluesky in the ATmosphere).
So there's a win/win opportunity for an independent multipolar non-profit entity to complement the dominant corporation. Bluesky benefits just as much from FoF as the AI-focused companies (including Mozilla) who are the majority of the FoF 'custodians'. The need for an alternate Relay is just a convenient artifact that many people have (for whatever reason) focused on.
BTW this from the article was hysterical:
"The "Fediverse" has been around for a while and though it has never been more popular than it is now,..."
No, actually, the Fediverse had more than twice as many active users two years ago than it does today. Don't get me wrong, there's still a lot of interesting stuff happening here, but let's be realistic!
So let me get it right: #Mozilla shut down their #Mastodon instance and are now promoting that https://freeourfeeds.com/ #BlueSky communitywashing attempt? Oh #FreeOurFeeds is also backed by that #SWF #SocialWebFoundation who can count as partners that same #MetaPlatformsInc owned by that same #MarkZuckerberg that “has gone full #ElonMusk” allegedly triggering the FOF in the first place
What a bunch of #hypocrites
Oh, hah, for a second I completely forgot that Meta is part of the Social Web Foundation, hm.
Remember when @evan blocked me because of my campaigning in favour of the #Fedipact?
While we're at it, a reminder tha #MetaPlatformsInc is a member of his #SocialWebFoundation #SWF, whose mission is to promote the growth of a “multipolar” #Fediverse.
https://socialwebfoundation.org/
I still think we'd be better off without certain poles, but you do you.
@evanprodromou @evan can you use a Tag Luke #swf ?
The Social Web Foundation website is a Fediverse group?! CW: Fediverse meta, non-Mastodon Fediverse meta
9 things the Social Web Foundation could do to prioritize safety (if they decide they want to)
https://privacy.thenexus.today/swf-safety/
Here's the list:
Will they? Time will tell!
Linking the Social Web Foundation (#SWF) to the #SocialHub, it's the process that is more important than the outcome. It's crucial to develop grassroots consensus processes that align with open, transparent governance. This can help manage the mess and delight of the libertarian, independent spirits often seen in open-source communities. Establishing a simple, ruff consensus allows people to mediate the mess-making and guide projects more efficiently. It encourages collective decision-making while respecting diverse views within the community.
Fostering this balance is essential for building a collaborative, effective path.
https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/proposal-linking-to-swf/4673
Poll: How much of the Social Web Foundation's resources should go to safety-related projects?
Safety's a critical issue on the fediverse, and SWF's budget is reportedly "closing in on $1M", so they could have a big impact here. Then again, there are lots of other important issues as well.
Your thoughts?
(See Will the Social Web Foundation prioritize safety? disucsses the general topic for more detailed discussion, but please feel free to vote in the poll where or not you read the article!)
Will the Social Web Foundation prioritize safety?
If they do, what are some good places to start?
https://privacy.thenexus.today/swf-safety-draft/
This is draft post, and feedback is very welcome. In fact, feedback on "what are some good places to start" is welcome even if you don't read the post ... later in this thread I'll include some of the ideas in the current version.