I’m really shite at explaining things. I shovel info into my brain, note what repeated actions practically I have to take or what to avoid & leave the rest. Explaining is not my gift which is why I love others whose gift it is
His response: (which came really quickly I might add
)
“No studies have been performed to measure nanoparticle-spike persistence in local or distal tissues”
And no studies have tested whether there’s a blue teapot orbiting Jupiter either (scientist snark) Point is that sure, this could be an issue. Sure, the nanos could also infest your brain, or it could this or that, but that doesn’t invalidate anything. This is FUD, (fear, uncertainty & doubt) - not invalid, but not a valid issue
“ ◦#Novavax expects a low potential for serious unwanted effects and toxicities in neonates, infants, and children” (they don’t know)
◦ “Novavax expects a low potential for serious unwanted effects and toxicities in pregnant women and fetuses” (they don’t know)
◦ “Novavax does not believe there are other special populations which would be more susceptible for serious unwanted effects and toxicities” (they don’t know)”
This is just dumb - who is this guy? Probably a MD, they think they understand science. Science doesn’t find Truth, it discovers truth. It will never be all encompassing. Short answer, we always will know less than can be known, so saying “they don’t know” is just asinine, of course they don’t! They can’t.
Addendum - studies cherry pick, you have to there’s never enough time or money. They studied the big issues, doubtful these are anything which is why they weren’t studied, and for darn sure getting COVID is worse (dumbass)
biodistribution of Novavax nanoparticle-spike has never been done and company “assumes” that it “mostly” stays in local lymph nodes because it should behave like a “conventional protein antigen” (it’s NOT, it’s a nanoparticle)
This looks like scare mongering, he doesn’t say anything but the word NANOPARTICLE is supposed to inspire fear, or something. A null statement.
OK
ALSO contains a saponin-based #MatrixM #adjuvant (40nm #nanoparticle, remarkably stable, held together by saponin-cholesterol interactions” (in rodents causes decreased body weight and red cell mass) – “may contribute to immunotoxicity”
This also is stupid - ask **** about how many times she’s heard **** or I say ANYTHING for certain - we don’t. We qualify everything. Built into techy types, we know nothing is known for 100% certainty - if you want that go join a religion
Yeah that’s probably enough too much to bother with, another technique FUD masters use is loooong, highly detailed posts that look smart and scientific, but it’s part of the advertising. Real scientists cut it short - that’s why there’s a précis/summary at the top. Get the idea in a paragraph and read the rest if you care
-End
Also his response to my Halloween wishes cracked me up
Alas, must continue on that ball gown pattern I started yesterday (wrap apron dress but put anything poufy underneath instant ball gown) hence goblin trick 2 for tomorrow. These goblins & ghouls are so draining