Create accountLogin

Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Only available when logged in.
med-mastodon.com is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Medical community on Mastodon

Administered by:

Server stats:

414
active users

med-mastodon.com: AboutProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.3.7

#medrxiv

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Public
Benjamin Carr, Ph.D. 👨🏻‍💻🧬

#Preprint sites #bioRxiv and #medRxiv launch new era of independence
The popular repositories, where life #scientists post research before #peerreview, will be managed by a new organization called #openRxiv.
Until now, they had been managed by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. The new organization, named openRxiv, will have a board of directors and a scientific and medical advisory board. It is supported by a fresh US$16M grant from Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI).
nature.com/articles/d41586-025

www.nature.comPreprint sites bioRxiv and medRxiv launch new era of independenceThe popular repositories, where life scientists post research before peer review, will be managed by a new organization called openRxiv.
Public
preLights

Another community-driven #preList is live! 🙌

A curated #preprint reading list, put together by a team of preLighters.

This list is brought to you by Chee Kiang Ewe, Mansi, Jessica Chevallier & Deevitha Balasubramanian.

Explore some excellent #genetics & #genomics preprints posted in the last few months!

#preList ⬇️👀

prelights.biologists.com/preli

preLightsEnd-of-year preprints - the genetics & genomics edition - preLights
#SciComm#biology#community
Public
Ivi Choc

Ugwu et al. medRxiv August 20, 2024

Risk Factors of Human Mpox (Monkeypox) Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

"...interaction with infected animals, HIV, other STIs, sexual contact/activities, contact with an infected person, MSM, and having multiple sexual partners, were associated with an increased risk of contracting Mpox."
"...patients who were vaccinated against smallpox had a lower risk of Mpox infection"

medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/20

medRxiv · Risk Factors of Human Mpox (Monkeypox) Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisBackground: Mpox (formerly Monkeypox) virus has affected the lives of thousands of individuals both in endemic and non-endemic countries. Before the May 2022 outbreak, Mpox infections were sporadically endemic in Central and Western Africa, still research into Mpox has been limited and lacking epidemiological data. Thus, identification of potential risk factors to better understand who is at risk of being infected is critical for future prevention and control. Objective: To synthesize comprehensive evidence on risk factors associated with human Mpox transmission both in endemic and non-endemic countries from inception to March 31, 2024. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed in conducting the systematic review. Electronic databases were searched. Two reviewers sifted the articles that were included in the review: firstly, by title and abstract, and secondly, by full text. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to assess the risk of bias for included articles. Fixed or random effects meta-analysis were conducted when at least two studies reported odds ratios (OR), relative risks (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I^2 statistic and sensitivity analysis was also done. The study protocol has been registered under PROSPERO with ID: CRD42023459895. Results: 947 articles were identified from the database search and 31 articles were eligible to be included in the systematic review. The findings of the meta-analysis showed that interaction with infected animals (OR=5.61,95%CI=2.83,11.13), HIV (OR=4.46,95%CI=3.27,6.08), other STIs (OR=1.76,95%CI=1.42,2.91), sexual contact/activities (OR=1.53,95% CI=1.13,4.82), contact with an infected person (OR=2.39,95%CI=1.87,3.05), being identified as men who have sex with men (MSM) (OR=2.18,95%CI=1.88,2.51), and having multiple sexual partners Mpox (OR=1.61,95%CI=1.24,2.09), were associated with an increased risk of contracting Mpox. However, patients who were vaccinated against smallpox had a lower risk of Mpox infection (OR=0.24,95%CI=0.11,0.55). Conclusion: This study is the first meta-analysis on reported risk factors for Mpox. Our analysis demonstrated that certain factors were associated with increased risk of Mpox, whereas smallpox vaccination had a protective role against contracting Mpox. The study findings could facilitate future strategic public health planning and targeted intervention. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement This research is funded by the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) under the Mpox and other601 zoonotic threats Team Grant (FRN. 187246). ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript. Other information related to the present study are also available upon reasonable request to the authors.
#Mpox#infection#RiskFactors
Public *
petersuber

New study: Given the publishing requirements for medical professors in #India, and given the number of future medical professors in the pipeline, it's possible to calculate that Indian medical journals cannot meet the expected author-side demand. "Thus there is a need to have a national medical #repository such as #MedRxiv to prevent publication in #predatory journals."
nmji.in/publication-requiremen

#GreenOA#Medicine#Preprints
Replied in thread
Public
Sciety

@gpollara @petersuber Sciety exists to showcase public preprint review and curation. Of the 31k evaluated preprints on Sciety, 18k are from #medRxiv and you can see the numbers continue to grow in our open data lookerstudio.google.com/s/hdRd

We also want to represent preprint highlighting and the social conversation in the near term. #preprints #PeerReview

Looker StudioSciety Evaluation Activity over timeLooker Studio turns your data into informative dashboards and reports that are easy to read, easy to share, and fully customizable.
Public
Arie van Deursen

Interesting study on COVID contact tracing, manually, or via apps. In NL, merely 2% of the PCR tests were done after a notification originating from the Dutch tracing app (CoronaMelder), and just 2.5% after being traced manually.

The study concludes that contact tracing, digitally or manually, had little effect (“limited impacts”).

medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/20

We found that the epidemiological impact of both DCT and MCT were limited during the Dutch 2020-2022 SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Only around 2% of all tests took place after a DCT notification, and 2-5% after a MCT notification depending on MCT capacity at the time. Additionally, test positivity among those testing after a DCT notification was significantly lower than among individuals testing for other reasons, the exposure-test intervals were longer after a DCT or MCT notification than for other reasons for testing, and about 20-36% of those who had received a DCT or MCT notification had symptoms at the time of test request and might have tested anyway even without having received the notification. These findings are in line with a self-evaluation performed by the Dutch PHS (GGD-GHOR) that found that the majority of tests at PHS test sites were not triggered by MCT or DCT notification, and test positivity was lower than average after DCT notification (13).
#covid19#coronaMelder#contactTracing
Public *
petersuber

#arXiv, @biorxivpreprint, and @medrxivpreprint have released their public comments on the the #OSTP #NelsonMemo.

From arXiv
info.arxiv.org/about/OSTP-04-1

From bioRxiv and medRxiv
connect.biorxiv.org/news/2023/

PS: There's a distinct echo of #Plan_U in these comments, tho without using the term. I'm glad to see it's still alive. Here's some background from 2019.
planu.org/

#bioRxiv, #medRxiv, #OAintheUSA, #preprints

info.arxiv.orgarXiv OSTP memorandum response - arXiv info
ExploreLive feeds
About