Marty Heyman<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@riotnrrd" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>riotnrrd</span></a></span> ... We could have a discussion about your opinion of COBOL. Your second point is on target. Developers responsibly write and test COBOL to Java translators and carefully make sure the results are correct (<a href="https://symas.social/tags/heirloomcomputing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>heirloomcomputing</span></a> among others). AI is a different matter altogether. GnuCOBOL simply compiles it to C and uses gcc to produce native programs. Our COBOL for GCC (gcobol) will be a GCC - native compiler. Recompilation is often all that is needed.</p><p><a href="https://symas.social/tags/cobol" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>cobol</span></a> <a href="https://symas.social/tags/gcobol" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>gcobol</span></a> <a href="https://symas.social/tags/gnucobol" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>gnucobol</span></a></p>