Not🐧A🐧Convicted🐧Felon<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://aus.social/@RaymondPierreL3" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>RaymondPierreL3</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.online/@paelse" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>paelse</span></a></span> The comment "There's nothing Taoist about it" seems really disconnected from the reality I've experienced. <br>Both lineages I've been taught, and the vast majority of what I've read about various different styles of <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/Taijiquan" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Taijiquan</span></a> have directly referenced its Taoist origins, and its deep connection and embodiment of Taoist philosophy and principles.<br>Whether this is its origins in Wudang, or the prime component of its name, the Taijitu, or the embodiment of the principles in the form (Wuwei, the three treasures, non-action, Yin/Yang, flow etc.) it's very much an embodiment of Taoism.<br>To say "my style of Taijiquan is Taoist, but yours isn't" seems at best dismissive.<br>I assume you don't mean to offend. <br>Again, not having practiced Moy Lin-Shin's style I can't directly compare.<br>My suspicion is that there is far less distance between his style and traditional Chen and Yang teachings than is being asserted.</p>