Jan R. Boehnke<p>A <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/SysReview" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>SysReview</span></a> (24 studies) synthesises evidence around the impact of adopting different perspectives when valuing child & adolescent <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/HRQL" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>HRQL</span></a><br><a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40273-025-01493-0" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">link.springer.com/article/10.1</span><span class="invisible">007/s40273-025-01493-0</span></a></p><p>Results show that differences in mean values arise with different perspectives on severe child <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/HealthStates" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>HealthStates</span></a>. These differences are influenced by factors such as health state severity and valuation method. Uncertainty remains regarding the optimal choice of preference elicitation and anchoring methods.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/HealthEconomics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>HealthEconomics</span></a></p>