Med-Mastodon

Nick Byrd, Ph.D.When people ask me how to estimate the sample size needed for their research question, my answers fall broadly into two buckets: power analysis and precision for planning analysis. But there seem to be other options as well.What's your preferred method? Preferred software? (Or software package?)<a href="https://qr.ae/pKnFql" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank">https://qr.ae/pKnFql</a><a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Stats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Stats</a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/QuantPsych" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#QuantPsych</a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/R" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#R</a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/TheNewStats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#TheNewStats</a>

Nick Byrd, Ph.D.Remember that "...WEIRDest people in the world" paper?Now <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/xPhi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#xPhi</a> has one: Of "171 experimental philosophy studies [from] 2017 [to] 2023 [including one of mine] most ...tested only Western populations but generalized beyond them without justification." Incentives may be part of the issue: "studies with broader conclusions ...had higher citation impact."<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.109" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.109</a><a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/xPhi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#xPhi</a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Culture" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Culture</a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/Demography" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Demography</a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/PhilSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilSci</a>

Nick Byrd, Ph.D.How do we know what participants thought when we presented our stimuli?<a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/ProcessTracing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ProcessTracing</a> can reveal what people saw (e.g., eye-tracking), consciously thought (e.g., concurrent think-aloud), etc.Combining those two methods revealed: (1) thinking aloud didn't impact gaze or word count (2) retrospective think-aloud left out thoughts that were mentioned concurrently (3) retrospective think-aloud introduced thoughts unmentioned concurrently<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14956-1_5" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14956-1_5</a><a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/CogSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#CogSci</a> <a href="https://nerdculture.de/tags/xPhi" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#xPhi</a>

Mark RubinPlanning a longitudinal study? Here’s four questions you should ask:🔹 How should time be scaled?🔹 How many assessments are needed?🔹 How frequently should assessments occur?🔹 When should assessments happen?Hopwood et al. (2022). “Connecting theory to methods in longitudinal research”: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211008407" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211008407</a> Author on Mastodon: <a href="https://mastodon.social/@aidangcw" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@aidangcw</a><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Stats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Stats</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Statistics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Statistics</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Methodology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Methodology</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Psychology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Psychology</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ResearchDesign" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ResearchDesign</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/LongitudinalResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#LongitudinalResearch</a>

Mark RubinNew paper provides a history of “voodoo science,” which discusses the controversy surrounding Vul et al.’s (2009) controversial article “Puzzlingly High Correlations in FMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition.”Five quotes follow: 🧵👉🔓 <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010015" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010015</a><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Neuroscience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Neuroscience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Neuroimaging" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Neuroimaging</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaResearch</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ReplicationCrisis</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilosophyOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilosophyOfScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilSci</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Fmri" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Fmri</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/VoodooCorrelations" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#VoodooCorrelations</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/UseNovelty" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#UseNovelty</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MultipleTesting" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MultipleTesting</a>

Mark RubinCritical Metascience:2022 has been a bumper year for what I’d call “critical metascience” - work that takes a step back and offers a critical perspective in the field.My Top 10 papers of 2022 in this area are, in alphabetical order… 🥁 🧵👉<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaResearch</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ReplicationCrisis</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SociologyofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SociologyofScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScienceofScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilosophyOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilosophyOfScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilSci</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilScidon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilScidon</a>1/12

Mark RubinReplicability and Theory:“Our results suggest that many of the practices that have been proposed as a means to improve the replicability of psychological research—such as open data and methods…preregistration and Registered Reports…and basing conclusions on Bayesian inference…or p < .005 rather than p < .05…—do indeed improve confidence in replicability among our sample.”Continued 🙂 🧵👉<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaResearch</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ReplicationCrisis</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilosophyOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilosophyOfScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilSci</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilScidon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilScidon</a>

John S. Wilkins<a href="https://fediscience.org/@MarkRubin" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@MarkRubin</a> This is massively simplistic. Hypotheses include the criteria for delineating phenomena in need of explanation, satisfaction criteria for success, disciplinary standards and practices, and taxonomies of subjects under investigation. IMO. <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaResearch</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ReplicationCrisis</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilosophyOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilosophyOfScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilSci</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilScidon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilScidon</a>

Mark RubinWhat’s a hypothesis?“A hypothesis is not simply a guess about the result of an experiment. It is a proposed explanation that can predict the outcome of an experiment. A hypothesis has two components: (1) an explanation and (2) a prediction. A prediction simply isn’t useful on its own.” (Haroz, 2014)Blog post: <a href="http://steveharoz.com/blog/2014/mysterious-origins-of-hypotheses-in-visualization-and-chi/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://steveharoz.com/blog/2014/mysterious-origins-of-hypotheses-in-visualization-and-chi/</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaResearch</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ReplicationCrisis</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilosophyOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilosophyOfScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilSci</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilScidon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilScidon</a>

Mark RubinA “quietist” response to the replication crisis:“The quietist approach proposes that we should just accept that it is in the nature of science that we get things wrong, and that this is particularly true with sciences in early stages of development.”Bird (2021). Understanding the replication crisis as a base rate fallacy.🔒 <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy051" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy051</a>🔓 <a href="https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/95454096/Replication_base_rate_fallacy_REV2.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/95454096/Replication_base_rate_fallacy_REV2.pdf</a><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaResearch</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ReplicationCrisis</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilosophyOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilosophyOfScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilSci</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilScidon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilScidon</a> <a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/philosophy" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@philosophy</a>

Mark RubinBad Stats / Poor Methods:Qualitative study finds 39.8% of 548 psychology researchers believe that statistics and/or research methods are misused and/or misunderstood in the field.Miranda et al. (May 2022). How do researchers in psychology perceive the field? A qualitative exploration of critiques and defenses. Collabra: Psychology.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.35711" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.35711</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Psychology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Psychology</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Stats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Stats</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Statistics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Statistics</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaResearch</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ReplicationCrisis</a>

Mark RubinNo evidence of p-hacking in imaging research:Analysis of 4,105 randomly sampled p-values finds no evidence of p-hacking in work published in over 100 imaging journals since 1972.Rooprai et al. (2022): <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0846537122113941" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/0846537122113941</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Stats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Stats</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Statistics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Statistics</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaResearch</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ReplicationCrisis</a>

Amanda Kay MontoyaDo you have <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/MissingData" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MissingData</a> ? (Yes, we all do). Do you worry your imputation model may not be correct? (Yes, we all do!) Check out this paper by colleagues and alum from <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/UCLA" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#UCLA</a> for a description of methods to evaluate compatibility of your imputation model! <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/Statistics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Statistics</a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/QuantMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#QuantMethods</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01749-5" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01749-5</a>

Mark RubinLooks like a great talk from Stephan Guttinger on Questionable Research Practices“What should be abandoned is not the idea of questioning practice, but the idea that there is a class of questionable research practices.” Slides: <a href="https://philstatwars.files.wordpress.com/2022/12/guttinger_draft_red.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://philstatwars.files.wordpress.com/2022/12/guttinger_draft_red.pdf</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaResearch" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaResearch</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ReplicationCrisis</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/QRPs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#QRPs</a>

Mark Rubin“We are not only in a replication but an interpretation crisis, a crisis of theory building.”Benjamin Krämer (<a href="https://social.saarland/@benjkraemer" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@benjkraemer</a>) (2022, November). Why are most published research findings under-theorized? In Questions of Communicative Change and Continuity. 🔓 <a href="https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/9783748928232-23.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/9783748928232-23.pdf</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ReplicationCrisis</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ScienceofScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ScienceofScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilosophyOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilosophyOfScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilSci</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilScidon" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilScidon</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Communication" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Communication</a>

Mark Rubin“The appropriate conclusion based on significant social-psychology experimental findings could perhaps be characterized as ‘sometimes this happens.’….Although ‘sometimes this happens’ may be disappointing compared with establishing universal laws, perhaps the field should accept this with both humility and pride.”Baumeister et al. (2022). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221121815" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221121815</a><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ReplicationCrisis</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilSci</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/SocialPsychology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#SocialPsychology</a> <a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/socialpsych" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@socialpsych</a>

Mark RubinReplicating experiments:New preprint considers the “minimum viable experiment to replicate.”“In this paper, we introduce the idea of a minimum viable experiment that needs to be identified in practice for replication results to be clearly interpretable.”Devezer & Buzbas. (2022). Preprint: <a href="http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/21475/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/21475/</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ReplicationCrisis</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilosophyOfScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilosophyOfScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PhilSci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PhilSci</a> <a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/philosophy" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@philosophy</a>

Mark RubinOn the questionable use of “Questionable Research Practices” (QRPs):“Practices labelled as ‘QRPs’ can be both beneficial and problematic for research practice and targeting them without a sound understanding of their dynamic and context-dependent nature risks creating unnecessary casualties in the fight for a more reliable scientific practice.”Stephan Guttinger. Talk to be presented on 1st Dec: <a href="https://phil-stat-wars.com/3-tentative-schedule/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://phil-stat-wars.com/3-tentative-schedule/</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Statistics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Statistics</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/OpenScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#OpenScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/MetaScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#MetaScience</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ReplicationCrisis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#ReplicationCrisis</a>

Mark RubinNew evidence that Bayes factors are misused in applied psychology:“The way forward is not to ban Bayesian inference from our toolbox. Instead, more and better education on Bayesian inference is needed.”Preprint: <a href="https://psyarxiv.com/du3fc/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://psyarxiv.com/du3fc/</a><a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Psychology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Psychology</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Stats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Stats</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Statistics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Statistics</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/PsychMethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#PsychMethods</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Bayes" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#Bayes</a>

Mark RubinOutliers:Should you identify them within groups or across groups, and what do you do with them when you find them?Preprint (forthcoming in JEP: General): <a href="https://psyarxiv.com/47ezg/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">https://psyarxiv.com/47ezg/</a> Few quotes follow 🧵👉<a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/stats" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#stats</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/statistics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#statistics</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/psychmethods" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#psychmethods</a>

Recent searches

Search options

Administered by:

Server stats:

#psychmethods