Heiko<p>A new report (commissioned by the German BSI) outlines the recent evolution of the <a href="https://floss.social/tags/OpenPGP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>OpenPGP</span></a> standard, including the new RFC 9580 and PQC drafts, as well as the spinoff "LibrePGP" draft that the GnuPG project writes.</p><p>PDF: <a href="https://github.com/crypto-security-tools/OpenPGP-LibrePGP-comparison/releases/download/v1.4/opgp-lpgp-comp.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">github.com/crypto-security-too</span><span class="invisible">ls/OpenPGP-LibrePGP-comparison/releases/download/v1.4/opgp-lpgp-comp.pdf</span></a></p><p>(Announcement email: <a href="https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/2g_rjYBqwqKZE6OEgjNb0bFo098/" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/</span><span class="invisible">openpgp/2g_rjYBqwqKZE6OEgjNb0bFo098/</span></a>)</p><p>Note that the document contains a one-page "Executive Summary", which (although quite technical) is worth a read.</p><p>[TL;DR: It raises concerns about the GnuPG draft's development process, as well as quality]</p>