med-mastodon.com is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Medical community on Mastodon

Administered by:

Server stats:

338
active users

#libraryhiring

0 posts0 participants0 posts today

“I’m not a fan of those “I’m different from everyone else”resumes when you begin to write a short novel on how awesome you are and then don’t provide any previous work experience to back that up.”

Please note: This is an anonymous response to an online survey; I do not have any way of contacting the respondent or verifying responses. Their answers may reflect good, bad, or middling hiring practices. I invite you to take what’s useful and leave the rest. If you are someone who hires Library, Archives or other LIS workers, please consider giving your own opinion by filling out the survey here

Current Hiring Practices and Organizational Needs

These questions are about your current hiring practices in general – the way things have been run the last year or two (or three).

Where do you advertise your job listings?

City HR posts on City website and Indeed

Do you notice a difference in application quality based on where the applicant saw the job ad?

No

Do you include salary in the job ad?

√ Yes

Do you use keyword matching or any automation tools to reduce the number of applications a human reads while considering candidates?  

√ No

Do you consider candidates who don’t meet all the requirements listed in the job ad?

√ Other: Depends on the type of job

Does your workplace require experience for entry-level librarian positions? (Officially or unofficially…)

√ Other: Not sure.

What is the current most common reason for disqualifying an applicant without an interview?

No skills or experience similar to the job requirements and duties.

Does your organization use one-way interviews? (Sometimes also called asynchronous or recorded interviews)

√ No

Do you provide interview questions before the interview? 

√ No

Does your interview process include taking the candidate out for a meal?

√ No, and I don’t think we ever have

How much of your interview process is virtual?

√ None

Do you (or does your organization) give candidates feedback about applications or interview performance?

√ Other: I’m the only direct hiring authority for the library department and I do not have the time to do so.

What is the most important thing for a job hunter to do in order to improve their hirability?

Gain experience in the field or have worked in a similar environment in which the skills can be easily transferable.

I want to hire someone who is: 

Flexible

Is there anything else you’d like to say about hiring practices at your organization or in current trends?

The city has one person in HR and I’m the only one in our department that has to set up interviews, conduct interviews, provide training and set up the new employee. I’m also the director, so on top of that I lose time from my own duties such as management, budgeting, facility upkeep etc.

Your Last Recruitment

These are questions about the last person you hired (or the last position you attempted to fill). This person may not have been a librarian, and that’s ok.

Think about the most recent time you participated in hiring someone (or an attempt to hire someone) at your organization. What was the title of the position you were trying to fill?

We lost half the staff in a month, so two Library Clerks and one library assistant

When was this position hired?

√ Within the last three months

Approximately how many people applied for this position?

√ 75-100

Approximately what percentage of those would you say were hirable?

√ 25% or less

And how would you define “hirable”?

Someone that can actually write a resume, has had work experience, shows that they are not a job jumper, demonstrates flexibility and the ability to learn tasks on their own without being micromanaged.

How did the recruitment for this position compare with recruitments in previous years?

More applications than a year before, but fewer qualified.

Your Workplace

This section asks for information about your workplace, including if you have lost positions in the last decade.

How many staff members are at your library/organization?

√ 0-10

Are you unionized?

√ No

How many permanent, full time job openings has your workplace posted in the last year?

√ None!

How many permanent, full time librarian (or other “professional” level) jobs has your workplace posted in the last year?

√ None!

Can you tell us how the number of permanent, full-time positions at your workplace has changed over the past decade?

√ There are the same number of positions

Have any full-time librarian positions been replaced with part-time or hourly workers over the past decade?  

√ I don’t know

Have any full-time librarian positions been replaced with non-librarian, lower paid staff positions over the past decade?   

√ I don’t know

Is librarianship a dying profession?

√ Other: Yes and No, depends on what part of the country you’re in.

Why or why not?

It will be if people continue to bar Librarians from doing their job and if tax payers don’t pay enough in taxes to sustain Libraries.

Demographics

This section asks for information about you specifically.

What part of the world are you in?

√ Southwestern US

What’s your region like?

√ Suburban area

What type of institution do you hire for (check all that apply):

√ Public Library 

What type(s) of LIS professionals do you hire? 

Besides the Director, 1 Youth Librarian.

Are you a librarian?

√ Yes

Are you now or have you ever been: 

√ A hiring manager (you are hiring people that you will directly or indirectly supervise),

√ A member of a hiring or search committee

Do you have any other comments, for job hunters, other people who hire, about the survey, or for Emily (the survey author)?

My comment is for the job hunters: For me, the hiring process starts with your resume. I look for clean and detailed information about your previous work experience, especially if you have never worked in a library before. Please spell check your resume too. It’s a “no” for me if you can’t take the time to check your work, especially being that library workers have to take the time to check the little details to find things and problem solve! You need to sell me on how those skills would translate to the library. Also do a cover letter to explain any gaps in your employment and tell me why you want to work for my library and what you can bring to the team and the community to make it better. Im not a fan of those “I’m different from everyone else”resumes when you begin to write a short novel on how awesome you are and then don’t provide any previous work experience to back that up.

I’m always looking for people who want to contribute something, are a team player, can be flexible, and want to learn through making mistakes. Even if you don’t have experience yet, people with integrity will get a place in the library over someone who may have the desired skill set. Certain qualities just can’t be trained into someone, while learning a new skill set can.

#1 #14 #25 #35 #books #GLAMJobs #Librarian #librarians #libraries #Library #libraryHiring #libraryInterview #libraryJobs #libraryWork #LISCareers #lisJobs

“I have withdrawn an application before out of fear of having my time wasted by being called in to interview and present, just so they can pick their internal hire.”

Please note: this is an anonymous response to an online survey; I do not have any way of contacting the respondent or verifying responses. Their answers may reflect good, bad, or middling job searching practices. I invite you to take what’s useful and leave the rest.

Your Demographics and Search Parameters

How long have you been job hunting?

√ More than 18 months

Why are you job hunting?   

√ I’m underemployed (not enough hours or overqualified for current position),

√ I’m employed outside of the field and I’d like to be in it,

√ Looking for more money,

√ My current job is awful/toxic,

√ I’ve been threatened at my job or had to deal with hostility/danger/scary behavior from the public or coworkers

Where do you look for open positions?  

ALA JOBLIST, CLIR+DLF, Indeed, Linkedin, HigherEd Jobs, Libgig

What position level are you looking for?  

√ Entry level,

√ Requiring at least two years of experience,

√ Supervisory,

√ Senior Librarian

What type(s) of organization are you looking in? 

√ Academic library,

√ Library vendor/service provider,

√ Public library

What part of the world are you in?

√ Southeastern US

What’s your region like? 

√ Suburban area

Are you willing/able to move for employment? 

√ No

What are the top three things you’re looking for in a job?

Pay that is commensurate with the cost of living, specifically rent, gas/commute, and food.

How many jobs have you applied to during your current search? (Please indicate if it’s an estimate or exact)

15

What steps, actions, or attributes are most important for employers to take to sell you on the job?  

√ Pay well,

√ Having (and describing) excellent benefits,

√ Introducing me to staff,

√ Funding professional development,

√ Prioritizing work-life balance

Do you expect to see the salary range listed in a job ad?

√ Yes, and it’s a red flag when it’s not

Other than not listing a salary range, are there other “red flags” that would prevent you from applying to a job?

Unexplained high turnover/seeing the same position reposted year after year.

The Process

How much time do you spend preparing an application packet?

2-3 hours

What are the steps you follow to prepare an application packet?

I tailor my resume and cover letter to the job description, highlighting my experience and how it relates to the position. I fill out every part of the application and include attachments of my transcripts and any applicable work samples.

How do you prefer to communicate with potential employers?

√ Phone for good news, email for bad news

When would you like potential employers to contact you? 

√ To acknowledge my application,

√ To tell me if the search is at the interview stage, even if I have not been selected,

√ Once the position has been filled, even if it’s not me

How long do you expect an organization’s application process to take, from the point you submit your documents to the point of either an offer or rejection?

3-4 months.

How do you prepare for interviews?

I research the department/institution and prepare questions to ask as well as prepare myself to explain how my experience would fit with the role and institution.

What are your most hated interview questions, and why?

“Tell me about a time you had a disagreement or conflict with somebody and what did you do to resolve it”. This question always feels like a trick question that is impossible to answer “correctly”.

During your current search, have you had any of the following experiences:

  • Submitted an application and got no response √ Happened the majority of the time or always
  • Had an interview and never heard back √ Happened more than once
  • Interviewed for a job where an internal candidate was eventually chosen √ Happened more than once
  • Asked for an accommodation for a disability √ Not Applicable
  • Withdrawn an application before the offer stage √ Not Applicable
  • Turned down an offer √ Not Applicable

If you have ever withdrawn an application, why?

I have withdrawn an application before out of fear of having my time wasted by being called in to interview and present, just so they can pick their internal hire.

If you’ve turned down an offer (or offers), why?

I have never turned down an offer because I have never received enough to do so.

What should employers do to make the hiring process better for job hunters?

Be respectful of candidates time and labor.

You and Your Well-Being

How are you doing, generally?

√ I’m frustrated,

√ I feel alone in my search

What are your job search self-care strategies?

Making myself stop/give up.

Job Hunting Post Graduate School 

If you have an MLIS or other graduate level degree in a LIS field, what year did you graduate? (Or what year do you anticipate graduating?)

2021

When did you start your first job search for a “professional” position (or other position that utilized your degree)?

√ Six months before graduating with my MLIS/other LIS degree

In relation to your graduation, when did you find your first “professional” position?

√ Six months to a year after graduating

What kind of work was your first post-graduation professional position? 

√ Contract,

√ Temporary/Limited Term

Did you get support from your library school for your first job hunt (and/or any subsequent ones)?

No..unless you count mass emailing job postings.

Researcher’s Corner: Rethinking the Academic Library Interview

In this post you’ll find very clear instructions for how to make interviews better – more relevant as well as fairer and kinder. Summer, Elizabeth and Mary Beth use candidate survey interviews to look at how changing long-standing practices in unprecedented times uncovered possibilities for improvements.

I think you will find the following post very interesting, and if you’d like to read more, see the following citation:

Krstevska, S., Ellis, E., & Lock, M. B. (2025). The Candidates’ Perspective on the Academic Library Interview Experience during COVID-19 . Library Leadership & Management, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.5860/llm.v38i3.7592

When the world shut down in March 2020, academic libraries had to reimagine not just how we served patrons, but how we hired one another. The long-standing tradition of multi-day, in-person interviews complete with campus tours, group meals, and whirlwind itineraries, was swiftly replaced by something new, and for many, unfamiliar: virtual interviews.

But how did this seismic shift feel to the people at the center of it, job candidates?

That’s the question we (Summer Krstevska, Elizabeth Ellis, and Mary Beth Lock) explored in our recent study, The Candidate’s Perspective on the Academic Library Interview Experience during COVID-19, published in Library Leadership & Management. Our research draws on 137 survey responses from academic librarian job candidates who interviewed between March 2020 and April 2022, offering a rare look at the interview experience from the other side of the (virtual) table.

Interviewing in Pajama Pants: A Relief or a Red Flag?

Let’s be clear: the pandemic didn’t just change how we interview. It invited us, well somewhat forced us really, to rethink why we do interviews the way we do. What purpose does a full-day campus tour serve when many of us, during the pandemic and even now, post pandemic, work hybrid schedules anyway? Is a candidate’s ability to perform a 50-minute presentation on short notice, answer interview questions off the cuff, and withstand a long and rigorous day of meet and greets really a proxy for job fit?

For many candidates, virtual interviews were a welcome change. The majority of our respondents preferred virtual formats, even beyond pandemic times. Reasons included lower stress, more control over environment, better accommodations for health and caregiving needs, and even better performance thanks to getting interview questions in advance.

One person summed it up perfectly:

“Virtual interviewing is wonderful and I hope it stays. It is so much easier to just take one day off rather than 2-3 for traveling.”

Another commented:

“I liked that completing the interview virtually allowed me time to actually take a break in privacy between meetings, which is difficult during in-person, on-campus interviews.”

In short, the virtual interview wasn’t just a substitute. It was, for many, better.

It’s Not the Modality—It’s the Design

That said, not everything about virtual interviewing was golden. While 71% of respondents said they left their interview with a strong understanding of the position and institution, nearly a third did not. And when we dug deeper, we found that it wasn’t whether the interview was virtual or in-person that made the difference. It was how the interview was designed.

Candidates who received interview questions and a detailed itinerary in advance were more likely to say they understood the role and the institution. Those who had input on logistics such as interview day and time, as well as ADA accommodations, had a more positive interview experience overall.

By contrast, rushed interviews, unclear expectations, and lack of context created confusion, and sometimes even distrust. Candidates were left wondering why their presentations were recorded, or why they weren’t introduced to anyone outside the library. The “why” behind the logistics mattered, and when it was absent, so was the sense of connection.

Design with Humans in Mind

So what does candidate-centered design look like in action? It’s not rocket science—or even budget-intensive. Here’s what our respondents told us they appreciated most:

  • Receiving interview questions in advance
  • Breaks built into the schedule
  • Being asked for input on date, time, and accommodations
  • Clear communication about who they’d be meeting and why
  • Not being recorded without consent (we heard this a lot)

And perhaps most importantly: recognizing that interviews are emotionally and physically taxing, even over Zoom. One respondent shared:

“I would have liked to have been offered a hotel room or some other non-home, non-current work third space for extended virtual interviews in the finalist round.”

The takeaway? Interview design should not be built around convenience for the committee. It should be built around the candidate experience. That’s not just kinder—it’s smarter hiring.

We Can Do Better—And Candidates Know It

We’re not saying every academic library should eliminate on-campus interviews. But we are saying we can be more intentional. Virtual interviews aren’t just a pandemic workaround, they’re an equity tool, a candidate-centered design opportunity, and a chance to rethink outdated norms.

Our study highlights the gap between tradition and transformation in academic library hiring. And the voices of our respondents remind us that, in a field that values access and inclusion, we owe it to job candidates to build interview experiences that reflect those values, too.

Because the question isn’t whether virtual interviews are here to stay. It’s whether we’re willing to build processes that work better, for everyone.

Summer Krstevska is the Business, Economics & Data Access Librarian at Wake Forest University, where she supports business school students as well as entrepreneurship minors, and the economics program. She is currently teaching her for-credit business research course for entrepreneurs on-campus & abroad. She holds a masters in library and information science from Simmons University.

Elizabeth Ellis is an Instruction Librarian at the Z. Smith Reynolds Library at Wake Forest University. Elizabeth develops and teaches credit-bearing information literacy courses at Wake Forest University, including Research After Wake, Critical Information Literacy, and a FYS on Banned Books. Elizabeth is very involved with the North Carolina Library Association and loves telling library stories to anyone who will listen. She received her MLIS from the University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

Further Questions: What are your favorite questions to ask in interviews?

Oh hey! This feature has been on hiatus since February, but now it’s back!

Let’s do a deeper dive into specific hiring questions! About once a month, I get answers from a group of people who hire library and LIS workers. I’d love to hear from you: what should I ask next time? Or, let me know if you’d like to join the pool of people who might answer.

This question is one of the most visited pages on Hiring Librarians, but it hasn’t been answered since 2014 so I think it’s beyond time for an update! This month I’m asking:

What are your favorite questions to ask in interviews? And why? If you can talk a little about the difference between what you ask over the phone versus in-person, that would be very helpful.

Anonymous: Good prompt! Here’s one of my favorites:

“This position will have multiple projects and daily tasks that will compete for your time. How do you determine priorities and manage your time?”

The follow up question is always: “How would you handle a situation in which you had two seemingly high-priority tasks where it was impossible to accomplish both.”

The first question helps me understand how the person works and their ability to stay organized. What kinds of tools do they talk about? How do they decide what is a priority? Do they work best in short bursts, or in longer stretches? The follow up tells me whether they understand how to work with a boss and within an organization. The real answer I’m looking for on the follow up is some combination of, “I’d ask my boss for help prioritizing,” and “I’d think about how my work affects other departments and/or ask them for help.” The hardest working, most creative person in the world is still going to struggle if they can’t work within the organizational structure; someone who says they’d just “pick one” to prioritize, without input, is a red flag.

In terms of phone vs. in-person interview questions, I use the phone interview for screening – understanding the person’s background, skills, and experience to date and how it relates to the position. If I’m unclear on whether they meet one of the requirements, the phone interview is the time to clarify. For example, someone may say they’ve supervised people, so the phone interview question will ask the context, their duties, how many people, whether they were faculty, staff, or students, etc. With the requirements out of the way, then the in person interview can be more forward-looking: how would you use your skills and experiences to move the library forward? How would you approach the job and work with your colleagues? Tell me about when you’ve faced a situation like x, how you handled it, the outcome, and what you learned. 

For equity, ALL interview questions should be based directly on something in the job description. Use the phone interview questions for the hard/technical skills and years of experience; use the in person interview questions for the soft skills. 

Donna Pierce, Library Director, Krum Public Library: As a small library I have never interviewed someone for a full-time position.  (All of my full-time positions were filled in-house.)  Plus a lot of the people who apply for the part-time positions do not have library experience.  So most of my questions are used to find out how well they can handle customer service, how interested they are in things other than reading (you know, in case someone wants to know something other than “what’s a good book?”!), and their attention to detail. But my all time favorite that I have asked for 19 years is “What materials should a juvenile be allowed to check out?”

Here are all the questions I ask:

  1. Describe the procedures you have used to keep track of things that require your attention.  (Calendar, phone reminders, etc.)
  2. Considering your education and work experience, why do you feel you are qualified for this job?
  3. What is a card or board game you would play with strangers to get to know them better? (If none – how would you break the ice with a group of strangers?)
  4. Have you ever had an experience in which you were glad you had paid attention to some particular detail? Please describe it.
  5. If you are planning on working another job (or attending college) how will that impact your ability to work for us? (Limited time available to work, no flexibility to re-arrange schedule if needed, etc.)
  6. Tell us about your experience with information technology. (web design/coding, databases, computers in general, Microsoft Office, Publisher, Canva, etc.)
  7. How do you learn a new piece of software or a new technology? How do you prepare to teach it or help others learn to teach it?
  8. What contributions could you make to our library?
  9. If you could live in any TV show, what would it be?
  10. What book/game/TV show/album would you recommend to someone? Why?
  11. What is your favorite age group and why? How should that group – and others – behave in the library?  
  12. What would you do if you were unsure of how to answer a patron’s question?
  13. How would you handle a person who objected to a book or movie in the library?
  14. What materials should a juvenile be allowed to check out?
  15. What is your philosophy and approach to managing conflict?

You would be surprised at how much you learn about someone with questions 9 and 10!

Anonymous: I think my answer has evolved so much since 2014! 

As a final question (well, after the do you have any questions for us), I like to ask if there is anything the candidate would like to expand on from the interview, or reframe, or tell us something we didn’t ask but should know. 

This gives the candidate the chance to shine, or regroup, or end on a positive note. Interviews are so stressful and often the stakes are high, so let’s all give everyone one more opportunity to impress. 

And yep, some foks add nothing. 

We don’t do phone interviews much anymore. Although sometimes Deans or VPs might call.

We do Zoom, then on campus for finalists. But in the past, phone interviews were really about screening. We would call more people to give more chances, but still only brought a few to campus. 

I have called to clarify that the candidate understands which location they would be working at (we have five) or that adjunct is part-time. That is to save everyone’s time!

Melissa Moore, Head of Access Services, Ferndale Area District Library: One of my favorite questions to ask during an interview is “Describe an experience you had where you think you really made someone’s day after you helped them.”

This question gives me a lot of insight into what a person considers a positive interaction. It also tells me a lot about what they value and their thought processes. It tells me: what the person considers a positive interaction, what they consider help, what they think ‘made someone’s day,’ and a little insight into their motivations.

I don’t do phone interviews here, so I don’t have a comment on this.  I select 4-6 of the applicants for a single, in-person interview with me and two other managers/administrators (depending on who is available). The positions I hire for are generally entry level so I don’t need as long of an interview process. The other departments will do a two stage process. First interview is over Zoom, the field is narrowed to 2 or 3, then the final candidates are called for an in-person interview. All departments are required to have the department manager and two other managers in the interviews, per the most recent union contract.

Anonymous Director, Medium-Sized University Library: Favorite questions to ask in interviews include :

  • Can you please tell us about your experience [using or doing or managing or leading] [one of the aspects of job from job description]?
  • What do you think you’ll enjoy the most and find most challenging about [something related to job description]
  • How would you get staff buy-in before implementing…
  • Can you give us an example of a time when communication between you and your staff or colleagues did not go well. How did you overcome the issue (if you did)?
  • Describe a time when you were a part of a great team. What qualities did you appreciate the most in your colleagues?
  • Can you please tell us about a time that you had to adjust or shift what you were working on because priorities outside of your control changed? How did you decide to revise, let go, or change what you were working on?
  • What interests you the most about this position and the prospect of working at…

And always, always, “What questions do you have for us?” Please be prepared to ask some!

Celia Rabinowitz ,Assistant Vice-President for Academic Engagement and Director of Mason Library, Keene State College: It has been six years since I last participated in a search for a library faculty position at my college library and three years since my last library staff search. In my current position the library faculty form the search committee and I am do not participate in phone interviews or in-person meetings that the search committee has with the candidates. I do get time with each candidate. This is because the search committee makes a recommendation to me and the provost for hiring and I have a level of authority higher than the search committee to make a decision. That said, it rarely happens that there is a disagreement. I do participate fully in searches for all non-librarian positions.

I like to ask candidates for staff positions what they enjoy most and least about their work. This can be more successful to ask in person (or a video platform) just so the candidate really understands that I do want to hear about the things that are the least satisfying about their work. I have used it on the phone and in person. For faculty positions I sometimes ask about the focus of their professional reading has changed over the past few years, and how it helps them think about their practice. My professional reading habits have changed a lot over time, so I’m always interested in how colleagues think about that.

Questions have also included asking candidates to describe a work project or experience that made them feel valuable and valued and why, to describe an experience working on a team and what went well (and didn’t), for staff I might ask candidates to describe how they prioritize their work day and how they handle various types of interruptions, and how they prefer to work with supervisors (for staff positions). These positions do not always require prior experience so I don’t want to ask questions that might put any candidate at a disadvantage.

Questions for library faculty are usually more specialty specific to the positions, e.g., Collections, Instruction, etc. I do often ask candidates to describe how they mange situations working with people (library colleagues, non-library faculty, etc). with differing opinions, needs, etc.

For all the job seekers out there – good luck and keep at it! For all the hiring managers and search committee folks – you know how important the work is. Many of us won’t have the opportunity to grow our workforce while we are still professionally active. I am glad to know that many libraries still can.

Gretchen Corsillo, Director, Rutherford Public Library: I love behavioral questions and feel they are a great way to get to know a candidate better. In interviews for any public-facing role, I like to ask about the candidate’s customer service philosophy. What does good customer service look like to them? Can they provide an example of a time when they provided customer service that they’re really proud of (or received great customer service, if they are new to this type of role)? It doesn’t have to be library-specific; in fact, I’ve found this to be a nice way to help candidates tie in transferable skills they may have developed elsewhere. This can truly set someone apart from the rest of the pack. I also try to provide examples of real situations they may be faced with and ask how they would respond. This sheds light on a candidate’s critical thinking skills and is also a great way to show off knowledge they’ve gathered about the library. We are no longer doing as many phone interviews in my library post-pandemic, but I think these types of questions especially help in that situation where we may not be able to get as good of a read on a candidate’s personality in the absence of facial expressions, mannerisms, etc.

K.T. Vaughan, Hal F. and Barbra Buckner Higginbotham University Librarian and Professor, Washington and Lee University: When developing questions for interviews I first start with the job requirements. Since the purpose of the questions is to determine how well people meet our qualifications and needs for the position, we need to ask ones that will get us data to rate each candidate. Screening interview questions tend to be more factual than on-campus ones, in which we’re trying to gauge both aptitude and enthusiasm for a position. 

For an entry-level librarian position in an academic library, one of our qualifications has been “Any combination of experience and coursework in the fundamentals of library-based data services.” In the screening interview, I might ask, “What is your background in data science or library-based data services?” In the on-campus interview, I might ask, “Talk to us about your favorite data-related project that you’ve worked on. Why is it your favorite? What made it go well?” I also like the question, “What did you love about your most recent library job/class?”

We share our questions in advance, and lately I’ve seen an uptick in seemingly AI-generated responses that people read from notes. As a result, I’m now leaning more towards questions in which I ask about the person’s unique experiences or ideas. For example, I used to ask, “What is your preferred communication style with your manager or colleagues?” We started getting unusually similar responses from candidates. Now I ask, “Tell us about a time when you thought communication with your manager or colleagues went really well.” 

As University Librarian, I usually have the last meeting of the day with a candidate. The four questions I ask are: What did you learn today that excited or surprised you? How do you see this position as part of your career arc? What have we not asked you or talked about that you’d like to share? And finally, What questions do you have for me, or that haven’t been answered yet?

Anonymous: I have a few favorite questions depending on the job opening.  One I particularly like: What did you do to prepare for this interview? Perhaps not a great question for someone interviewing for a part-time shelver job but if they are interviewing for any type of reference job, they should at LEAST have looked at the library website. Maybe they talked to other people in a similar job, etc.  This will give you some insight on their process.  Maybe they took a shower, got dressed and showed up — and maybe that is ok if they have a lot of experience in the position you are hiring for etc.  Most of the time you would want them to at least have reviewed the job posting.

2. Describe a time when you disagreed with the course of action that an institution was taking.  How did you react/improve the situation? Are you looking for a person who will blindly follow anything you decree?  Or do you want someone who will confront questionable policies? 

3. How are you organized? Would you describe yourself as a disciplined and systematic person, or are you more a creative and innovative person? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the way you work? No right or wrong answer here but gives you some insight.  If your team already leans one way or the other, it might be helpful to have someone who thinks differently.

3.  Can you tell us about a time when you analyzed information or data and evaluated it to solve a problem.  Would love to hear about how the data sent you in a direction you weren’t anticipating. (analyzing work, collection, training needed). If you are hiring for a position that could benefit from someone who can deal with data, this is a great question. If they have no experience with analysis, you might get a vibe about their desire and ability to do so. If they have worked in a job that required analysis they better have a story about how the result was unexpected.

4. How do you evaluate programs that you offer? How do you determine if a program is successful or not? If you decide it was not successful, would you consider doing the program again? I like this because it gives you a sense of how they see success.  Also, for me, it is good to think they might give something that they worked hard on a second or even third try if it WASN’T successful the first time.  However, I don’t need someone who will continue with something forever even if it doesn’t work but because it was their idea and they just love it.  Things may work well for years and years then the need goes away, the population changes or whatever.  Libraries should always be thinking about things they don’t really need to do anymore and not just operate on auto pilot.

5. Do you have any questions for us?  We will often be more leading with this – “Do you have any questions for us about the library, the job, or the requirements?” Once again, depends on what type of job you are interviewing for but if there are no questions (and they could have asked throughout the interview) is that because they just aren’t really interested?  Or they just left a job JUST LIKE THIS at the library district down the street?  But even then, a question about scheduling, etc. would be appropriate. If it is a higher level job and they don’t ask about the details or the culture or anything, it is worrisome.

For my library – we have not done phone interviews.  We have done some Zoom interviews.  The questions we ask are the same either way.

Kellee Forkenbrock, Public Services Librarian, North Liberty Community Library: My favorite interview question to ask is, Imagine yourself as a customer who received excellent service. What made the experience excellent? I like this question because it places the candidate into the shoes of a patron and gives them a viewpoint of what customer service should look like from that perspective. Sometimes we get standard responses to the hypothetical situation (‘..friendly, knowledgeable, quick…’). Other times, the candidate will tell us about an actual interaction they had during a sales transaction. The question is a great way to emphasize the importance of patron service an d what it looks like in action. 

Chad Deets, Assistant Librarian, Acquisitions and Metadata, Arizona State University: In the majority of the hiring processes I’ve participated in, it was necessary to pick questions and have them filed ahead of time. It was always a mixture of questions designed to assess both technical ability and soft skills. The questions are usually worded to be scenario-based and ask for examples from the candidate’s history. If the candidate paid attention, particularly to the soft skill questions, they ccould infer some of the problems/concerns that we were facing. One example might be “tell us about a time when you collaborated with colleagues from other departments. Did you experience communication challenges and if so, how did you overcome them?” This question likely demonstrates that at the institution, there have been past challenges in communication between colleagues from different departments, and that it’s important to the committee to find a candidate who is able to navigate these types of challenges.

Because questions had to be chosen in advance, we really didn’t ask anything different in-person than we would over the phone or via a virtual platform. I should note that we were able to ask follow-up questions that were unscripted, but I cannot think of anything that we did differently between the two mediums.

Of course, one of the more telling responses comes to the question “do you have any questions for us”? Particularly in libraries, curiosity is your friend and shows the committee that you take an interest in the position, the organization, etc.

Anonymous: We do not do phone interviews (we will do a zoom for out-of-area applicants) I think my favorite interview question is “why do you want to work in a public library?” It’s very open ended but I like to see where the applicant takes this. Some respond with “I like the quiet environment” or “I love books/reading” and some talk about community services and collaboration in meaningful work.

Hiring Librarians Podcast S02b E13: Talkin Union with Jaime Taylor

We’re back!

After an unintentionally long break, we’re back. Let’s consider this Season 2b.

This episode my guest is Jaime Taylor. Jaime is a contributing person-who-hires-library-workers on the Further Questions feature here on Hiring Librarians (which returns tomorrow), the Discovery & Resource Management Systems Coordinator at the W.E.B. Du Bois Library, University of Massachusetts, a proud union member, AND a coordinator of library staff working in THREE different unions. On this episode of the hiring librarians podcast, we’re talking about unions, hiring, getting hired, and what exactly systems librarians do anyway. I hope you enjoy and I’d love to hear your thoughts on the topic.

An AI-generated and not completely error free transcript is here.

Speaking of links, in this episode we talk about:

This podcast is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube music and other various podcasting sites (let me know if you can’t find it on your preferred platform).

I’d love to hear your requests or other feedback for moving forward. And please do reach out if you want to be a guest!

“the administration wants to eliminate a librarian position the next time it becomes vacant and make it a lower paid staff position”

Please note: This is an anonymous response to an online survey; I do not have any way of contacting the respondent or verifying responses. Their answers may reflect good, bad, or middling hiring practices. I invite you to take what’s useful and leave the rest. If you are someone who hires Library, Archives or other LIS workers, please consider giving your own opinion by filling out the survey here

Current Hiring Practices and Organizational Needs

These questions are about your current hiring practices in general – the way things have been run the last year or two (or three).

Where do you advertise your job listings?

Institution website and sometimes Indeed

Do you notice a difference in application quality based on where the applicant saw the job ad?

Do you include salary in the job ad?

√ Other: Yes and no. If the institution does post it, they hide behind using the matrix indicator and not the actual dollar amount

Do you use keyword matching or any automation tools to reduce the number of applications a human reads while considering candidates?  

√ No

Do you consider candidates who don’t meet all the requirements listed in the job ad?

√ Yes

Does your workplace require experience for entry-level librarian positions? (Officially or unofficially…)

√ N/A – we don’t hire librarians

What is the current most common reason for disqualifying an applicant without an interview?

Not enough applicable experience. Doesn’t have to be library experience, but needs to have transferable skills.

Does your organization use one-way interviews? (Sometimes also called asynchronous or recorded interviews)

√ No

Do you provide interview questions before the interview? 

√ Other: Morning the part, but I’ve asked to do so in current and future postings

If you provide interview questions before the interview, how far in advance?

Plan to provide the day before

Does your interview process include taking the candidate out for a meal?

√ No, and I don’t think we ever have

How much of your interview process is virtual?

√ None: 

Do you (or does your organization) give candidates feedback about applications or interview performance?

√ Other: I would if asked. This is something I would explore doing proactively in future postings

What is the most important thing for a job hunter to do in order to improve their hirability?

Follow instructions of application process/provide a complete application package

I want to hire someone who is: 

Teachable

Your Last Recruitment

These are questions about the last person you hired (or the last position you attempted to fill). This person may not have been a librarian, and that’s ok.

Think about the most recent time you participated in hiring someone (or an attempt to hire someone) at your organization. What was the title of the position you were trying to fill?

Coordinator of Library Services

When was this position hired?

√ Within the last three months

Approximately how many people applied for this position?

√ 25 or fewer

Approximately what percentage of those would you say were hirable?

√ more than 75%

And how would you define “hirable”?

Applicable experience and education

Your Workplace

This section asks for information about your workplace, including if you have lost positions in the last decade.

How many staff members are at your library/organization?

√ 0-10

Are you unionized?

√ No

How many permanent, full time job openings has your workplace posted in the last year?

√ 3-4

How many permanent, full time librarian (or other “professional” level) jobs has your workplace posted in the last year?

√ 1

Can you tell us how the number of permanent, full-time positions at your workplace has changed over the past decade?

√ There are the same number of positions

Have any full-time librarian positions been replaced with part-time or hourly workers over the past decade?  

√ No

Have any full-time librarian positions been replaced with non-librarian, lower paid staff positions over the past decade?   

√ Other: No, but the administration wants to eliminate a librarian position the next time it becomes vacant and make it a lower paid staff position. I’m prepared to vigorously oppose that action leading up to and when the attempt is made

Is librarianship a dying profession?

√ No

Demographics

This section asks for information about you specifically.

What part of the world are you in?

√ Southwestern US

What’s your region like?

√ Rural area

What type of institution do you hire for (check all that apply):

√ Academic Library 

Are you a librarian?

√ Yes

Are you now or have you ever been: 

√ A hiring manager (you are hiring people that you will directly or indirectly supervise),

√ A member of a hiring or search committee

#1 #14 #25 #35 #books #GLAM #GLAMJobs #Librarian #librarians #libraries #Library #libraryHiring #libraryInterview #libraryJobs #libraryWork #libraryjobs #LIS #LISCareers #lisJobs

Researcher’s Corner: The current state of female representation in library leadership in the U.S.

Here’s another piece of research that addresses something commonly held to be true, and in this case provides support for what we “know”: Women are underrepresented in library leadership positions. I’m pleased to be able to share with you statistical analysis by Daniel McGeeney. He uses a large sample size and discusses this trend across library types.

I think you will find the following post very interesting, and if you’d like to read more, see the following citation:

McGeeney, J. D. (2025). The Current State of Female Representation in Library Leadership: A Comprehensive Analysis of Over 13,000 Open U.S. Libraries by Library Type, Collection Size, and State. Journal of Library Administration, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2025.2518008

A preprint is available here: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/3jauw_v1

Women made up 82.5% of librarians as of 2023 according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (U.S. Census Bureau, 2024a), but they are underrepresented in leadership positions (McGeeney, 2025). This issue has received a lot of research attention, leading to extremely informative studies like “Leveling Up: Women Academic Librarians’ Career Progression in Management Positions” by Lorelei Rutledge (2020). Unequal pay, gendered expectations, and lack of mentorship are some of the underlying causes. Rutledge heard from female librarians who described instances when their male bosses excluded them from social events, when male employees were groomed for director positions, and when their decisions and errors were subjected to a higher level of scrutiny (2020). Women who try to overcome the stereotype of men as natural leaders often violate gender norms, which they may be penalized for (Heilman, Wallen, Fuchs, & Tamkins, 2004). This aligns with the experiences of women who reported being told to be friendlier, to smile more often, or to be less assertive (Rutledge, 2020).

Controlled psychological experiments show evidence of unequal standards in hiring practices. Player, de Moura, Leite, Abrams, & Tresh (2019) conducted a hiring simulation and found that participants placed more value on leadership potential than performance when evaluating male candidates. Women, on the other hand, were expected to demonstrate their competency rather than simply showing potential. This reluctance to view women as possessing leadership potential has been observed in other studies. In a large retrospective study of 29,809 management-track employees, women consistently received lower ratings for their leadership potential than men—even when they had received higher job performance ratings (Benson, Li, & Shue, 2024).

Goals and Methods

Other studies have measured the gender gap in library leadership, but they often rely on samples with limited size or representativeness. In my recent study (McGeeney, 2025), I set out to estimate the gender gap from a very large sample spanning all 50 states and library types. Using publicly available data on Library Technology Guides, I identified 13,891 library directors working at 13,870 distinct U.S. libraries that were still open at the time of analysis (Breeding, 2024). Each library director was assigned their most likely sex based on their first name. Specifically, I calculated the probability that each director’s name was assigned to male versus female at birth using (a) first name frequencies on birth certificates by age and sex, (b) survival rates by age and sex, and (c) job distributions by age and sex. The input data for this work included first name frequency files (U.S. Social Security Administration, n.d.-a), survival rates (U.S. Social Security Administration, n.d.-b), and U.S. Census data on employment (U.S. Census Bureau, 2024b).

Results

I found that women are underrepresented in leadership positions at four of the five library types (McGeeney, 2025). At academic libraries, women make up 76% of librarians but only 68% of directors. At school libraries, women make up 93% of librarians but only 82% of directors. At special libraries, women make up 70% of librarians but only 65% of directors. At government libraries, women make up 82% of librarians but only 68% of directors. The gender gap is the difference between these two values.

Library Type% of Library Directors that are Women% of Librarians that are WomenGender GapMale-to-Female Director ProbabilityAcademic67.7% (65.9%, 69.4%)75.9%-8.2%150.6%Public83.8% (83.0%, 84.5%)81.1%+2.7%83.3%School82.3% (79.7%, 84.7%)93.0%-10.7%285.5%Special64.5% (61.6%, 67.4%)70.1%-5.5%128.6%Government67.5% (58.3%, 75.8%)82.2%-14.7%221.8%

As the table shows, women are slightly overrepresented in public library leadership by 2.7 percentage points, but this may not be true at larger libraries. The study reports that the female director percentage decreases exponentially with size (McGeeney, 2025). The smallest libraries in the sample have over 90% of director positions held by women. At the largest libraries, that figure is less than two-thirds. The exponential decay trend persists when restricting the analysis to public libraries only or academic libraries only.

The last column in the table converts the overall gender gap into a person-level metric. It answers the question: how much more likely is an individual male librarian than an individual female librarian to be director? In a school library, a male librarian’s chances of being director are almost three times that of a female librarian. In a public library (at the other end of the spectrum), an individual male librarian’s chances of being director are 83.3% that of a female librarian (McGeeney, 2025).

One way to dig deeper into these results is to ask, “who hires the library director?” For public libraries, local government typically appoints an external board (e.g., a board of trustees, advisory board, or oversight board), which has the primary responsibility of hiring a library director. On average, these boards are more male dominated than public libraries themselves (Jonason, Green, Kinard, Cruz-Solano, & Rathnavel, 2024). An even larger imbalance may exist in colleges and universities, which tend to have male-dominated upper leadership. For instance, a 2023 report found that only 32.8% of college and university presidents are female (Melidona, Cecil, Cassell, & Chessman, 2023). If female candidates for leadership roles are evaluated disproportionately by men, then this could contribute to their underrepresentation as directors (McGeeney, 2025).

My hope for this study is that it supports ongoing research into the patterns behind and causes of these gender gaps. To that end, there are many other areas to explore. Future research could dedicate more effort into investigating which Census datasets provide the best comparison, assessing trends over time, inspecting how well the Census industries map to library types, quantifying the uncertainty of Census-based estimates, and looking at geographic variation. It would also be interesting to develop methods for capturing non-binary genders, and I suggest one idea in the main paper. Libraries are unique in how female dominated the workforce is, but lessons in how to work toward gender parity extend to many other professions and industries. Paramount is the experiences of women, and studies like Rutledge’s (2020) and many others I cite in the article are critical contributions to the literature, which make the data and statistics I present meaningful.

References

Benson, A., Li, D., & Shue, K. (2024, April 19). “Potential” and the Gender Promotions Gap. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4747175

Breeding, M. (2024). Retrieved December 2024, from Library Technology Guides: https://librarytechnology.org/

Heilman, M., Wallen, A., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. (2004). Penalties for Success: Reactions to Women Who Succeed at Male Gender-Typed Tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 416-427. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416

Jonason, A., Green, T., Kinard, P., Cruz-Solano, V., & Rathnavel, S. (2024). Out of Balance: A National Assessment of Women’s Representation on Local Appointed Boards. Retrieved December 2024, from https://hiringlibrarians.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/811d5-nationalappointmentsstudy.pdf

McGeeney, J. D. (2025). The Current State of Female Representation in Library Leadership: A Comprehensive Analysis of Over 13,000 Open U.S. Libraries by Library Type, Collection Size, and State. Journal of Library Administration, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2025.2518008

Melidona, D., Cecil, B., Cassell, A., & Chessman, H. (2023). The American College President: 2023 Edition. American Council on Education, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from https://www.acenet.edu/Documents/American-College-President-IX-2023.pdf

Player, A., de Moura, G., Leite, A., Abrams, D., & Tresh, F. (2019). Overlooked Leadership Potential: The Preference for Leadership Potential in Job Candidates Who Are Men vs. Women. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00755

Rutledge, L. (2020). Leveling Up: Women Academic Librarians’ Career Progression in Management Positions. College & Research Libraries, 81(7). https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.7.1143

U.S. Census Bureau. (2024a, January 26). Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Retrieved December 2024, from https://www.bls.gov/cps/data/aa2023/cpsaat11.htm

U.S. Census Bureau. (2024b, September 12). American Community Survey 1-Year Data (2005-2023). Retrieved December 2024, from https://www.census.gov/data/developers/data-sets/acs-1year.html

U.S. Social Security Administration. (n.d.-a). Popular Baby Names. Retrieved December 2024, from https://www.ssa.gov/oact/babynames/limits.html

U.S. Social Security Administration. (n.d.-b). Actuarial Life Table. Retrieved December 2024, from https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html

Daniel McGeeney is an unaffiliated independent researcher who spent nine years working in secondary education before becoming a statistician and social scientist. 

Researcher’s Corner: Rightsizing

Rightsizing was not a term I had heard before coming across Kathleen Baril’s article. Like many folks, I’ve been thinking and worrying about economic uncertainty, possible recessions, and shaky funding in libraries. I was interested to read about this conceptual alternative to downsizing, and I think you will be to.

If this post whets your appetite and you’d like to read more, see the following citation:

Baril, K. (2025). Staffing rightsizing: analyzing staffing studies to inform potential rightsizing practices. Reference Services Review, 53(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-03-2024-0013

Rightsizing in Libraries

As academic institutions continue to face uncertainty with the upcoming demographic cliff in enrollment or due to recent changes in federal funding, institutions are looking for ways to reduce costs. Often when more drastic cuts are needed, institutions turn to personnel cuts to quickly reduce costs which is what is commonly called downsizing. Rightsizing is a more measured approach which is invested in both long and short term goals for the organization and tries to align the work of the unit to the organization’s goals. It is a carefully planned activity involving analysis of work. Rightsizing may or may not reduce costs or personnel as part of the analysis process.

Rightsizing can occur at any time but in libraries optimal times for rightsizing might be: the creation of new strategic plans or directions, a change in leadership, change in technology, the need to improve the user experience, retirements or current staff leaving positions. Any rightsizing activity should improve the library’s activities which could be an improvement in the efficiency of workflows or the improvement of the library’s services.  

The library literature is mostly concerned with working with the effects of downsizing but some examples of rightsizing can be found. For example, there are several studies that looked at trends in staffing and expenditures. These trends could possibly assist libraries to benchmark their staffing and expenditures to advocate for more staffing or a larger budget. Libraries could rightsize on a macro level using this data.  

Another approach found in the literature for determining staffing was activity analysis. In these studies, libraries analyzed tasks or a particular task within a unit to determine what staffing was needed and to find ways to be more efficient in the completion of the task. For example, several researchers (Fuller and Dryden, 2015 and Meert-Williston and Sandieson, 2019), analyzed their chat reference transcripts and looked at the questions being asked and who could best answer those questions. From this data, they could determine who needed to monitor their chat reference. There are various activities that could be analyzed in the library including how books are cataloged, activities at service points such as the circulation and reference desks, and how workflows are conducted for interlibrary loan. Activity analysis could be made fairly easy if data is already being collected (like the chat transcripts). 

Another approach to rightsizing is for an organization to move to outsourcing. This practice can be controversial as often it is used to reduce costs by reducing staffing. This practice can be used in an ethical manner though for short-term projects or projects where specialized expertise is needed. For example, Michalak (2023) describes how his library utilized an outside vendor for a large deselection project. The vendor’s expertise in data analysis enabled the library to more easily identify good candidates for deselection and allowed for more efficient removal of materials. Oftentimes, especially for smaller libraries, budgeting to use an outside vendor to accomplish a task may be worth the extra money versus trying to train a staff member for a one-time task.  

Rightsizing is an important practice as it aligns current work practices with the institution’s current strategic goals and vision. Even for libraries which are not part of a larger institution, as strategic directions change, work practices will need to develop to meet new directions. Whether it be analyzing smaller activities or looking at larger trends, embedding rightsizing into a library’s activities can enable it to be more nimble to address a variety of changes. Rightsizing can also enable libraries to maintain efficient services and mindfully manage their resources to best serve their users.

References:

Baril, Kathleen. 2025. “Staffing Rightsizing: Analyzing Staffing Studies to Inform Potential Rightsizing Practices.” Reference Services Review 53 (1): 43–51. Available at: doi:10.1108/RSR-03-2024-0013.

Fuller, K. and Dryden, N.H. (2015), “Chat Reference Analysis to Determine Accuracy and Staffing Needs at One Academic Library”, Internet Reference Services Quarterly, Vol. 20 No. 3–4, pp. 163–181. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2015.1106999.

Meert-Williston, D. and Sandieson, R. (2019), “Online Chat Reference: Question Type and the Implication for Staffing in a Large Academic Library”, The Reference Librarian, Vol 60 No. 1, pp. 51–61. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2018.1515688.

Michalak, R. (2023), “Outsourcing Technical Services to Streamline Collection Management: A Case Study of an Academic Library’s Book Reduction Project”, Journal of Library Administration, Vol. 63 No. 5, pp. 682–699. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2023.2219604.

Kathleen Baril is the director of the undergraduate library at Ohio Northern University. She enjoys working at a small academic library where she can work in a variety of areas: instruction, marketing, outreach, management and facilities planning. She considers herself lucky to work with colleagues both inside and outside the library who are student-centered and always looking for better ways to teach.

For Public Review: Unnamed job hunter 38

Welcome to crowd-sourced CV and resume review for LIS job hunters!

Please help the job hunter below by using the comment button to offer constructive criticism on her resume. Some resources for constructive feedback:

This 2 page resume was submitted by a job hunter who says they are

“an MLIS holder returning from a career break. I am using this resume to apply for entry-level public library positions, including roles in General Services, Adult and Teen Services, Reference, Makerspaces, Cataloging, and Acquisitions.

I would also love to hear thoughts about optimizing for resume readers/ATS?”

Redacted resumeDownload

 

To submit your own resume or CV For Public Review,

  • First, take a look at the comments on previously posted resumes/CVs and see if any would apply to yours.  Edit if necessary
  • Your CV or resume will be posted as-is, so please remove any information that you are not comfortable having publicly available (I suggest removing your email address and phone number at a minimum)
  • Then, send it as a PDF to HiringLibrariansPeerReview@gmail.com
  • Please include a short statement identifying if it’s a resume or CV and describing the types of positions you’re using it for (institution type, position level, general focus)
  • Finally, you will also need to confirm that you agree to comment on at least five other posted resumes/CVs

Hiring Librarians Podcast S02 E12: Jay

Oh hey, it’s the twelfth episode of season two!

This episode my guest is Jay, who you may know from the Library Punk podcast. If you haven’t listened to it, it’s a leftist podcast, and I find it fun, interesting, and opinionated. I did an episode back in October. While I was there, Jay mentioned that he had recently transitioned from his role as the director of a small academic library to a role in the cataloging department of a public library system. I thought that would be an interesting journey to talk about, so (six months later) here we are. I hope you enjoy our conversation.

My system to generate the AI-generated and not completely error free transcript is currently down, but I’ll get that linked here ASAP.

Speaking of links, in this episode we talk about:

This podcast is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube music and other various podcasting sites (let me know if you can’t find it on your preferred platform).

I’d love to hear your requests or other feedback for moving forward. And please do reach out if you want to be a guest!

Hiring Librarians Podcast S02 E09: Katie Quirin Manwiller (part one of two)

Oh hey, it’s the ninth episode of season two! This is the first of two episodes discussing disability and LIS hiring. This first episode focuses a bit more on advice for people looking for work, and the second episode focuses a little more on advice for people doing hiring. But both of these perspectives come up in each episode.

Katie Quirin Manwiller is the Education Librarian and Assistant Professor at West Chester University. She is chronically ill and dynamically disabled. Katie’s scholarship focuses on improving disability inclusion in libraries through incorporating disability into equity work, addressing disability misconceptions, and creating accessible work environments. She is currently pursuing a second master’s degree focused on disability inclusion in higher education.

A few months ago, I was looking for resources to add to the “Accommodations and Disabilities” section of Interview Resources for Job Seekers. Katie Quirin Manwiller, who had written Hiring Better: Disability Accommodations & the Hiring Process here on Hiring Librarians, popped up to provide several great links. She was also kind enough to agree to come on the podcast to talk about this more (and not just once, but twice!)

You can find an AI-generated and not completely error free transcript here.

Here are links for some of the things we talk about in this episode:

  • #CripLib Website – for access to the Discord support network, and other LIS disability news and resources
  • ADA timeline – While we don’t specifically reference this timeline by the American Bar Association, we do discuss the relative recency of the ADA, and talk a little bit about the timeline of Disability rights in the US.
  • We Here Job Board – This is a job board for BIPOC in LIS. We don’t know of any job boards specifically for people with disabilities, but this one might be good for BIPOC library workers with disabilities.
  • Job Accommodations Network – One of the things this website provides is suggestions and information about possible accommodations for various disabilities, limitations, and occupations.
  • Navigating the Academic Hiring Process with Disabilities by Gail Betz – article describing academic librarians’ self-accommodations strategies (and you might also be interested in the synopsis she wrote for Hiring Librarians)

This podcast is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube music and other various podcasting sites (let me know if you can’t find it on your preferred platform).

I’d love to hear your requests or other feedback for moving forward. And please do reach out if you want to be a guest!

Call for Participation: LIS Hiring and Careers Research

Hi Friends!

I’m reaching out to a new round of folks for the series I call Researcher’s Corner. This series invites people who are researching some aspect of LIS hiring and careers to share their work in informal language, here on Hiring Librarians. Topics have included but are not limited to job seeking practices and experiences, career preparation, equity in the profession, salary, job skill requirements, and recruitment practices and experiences.

I have combed the databases for current papers and am in the process of emailing people to ask if they are interested. However, my dumb emails tend to get sent to spam by dumb overly-aggressive university spam filters. So, I thought I’d reach out in another way.

Are you a researcher into one of these topics? Would you like to share your research here? If so, would you please get in contact with me, either through my contact form or directly at HiringLibrarians at gmail?

Your Pal,

Emily

Hiring Librarians Podcast S02 E08: Meggan Press

Oh hey, it’s the eighth episode of season two!

I taped eight episodes last fall/winter and have been very very slow to edit. I’m very pleased to be able to share this one!

Meggan Press is the author of Get the Job: Academic Hiring For the New Librarian. This is a really good book about getting hired! She offers non-generic and empowering information for folks looking to start librarian work in academic libraries. It’s as if you had a smart, kindly mentor walking you through the process – not just the how but the why. But don’t take my word for it! In this episode, you’ll here more about her advice and opinions – we talk about the book and much more.

You can find an AI-generated and not completely error free transcript here.

This podcast is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube music and other various podcasting sites (let me know if you can’t find it on your preferred platform).

I’d love to hear your requests or other feedback for moving forward. And please do reach out if you want to be a guest!

Hiring Librarians Podcast S02 E04: Lindsay Cronk

Oh hey, it’s the fourth episode of season two!

As I mentioned last week, the thing that galvanized me to get this back up and running is that I wanted to do episodes with the candidates for 2026-27 ALA President. Voting starts March 10, so that gave me a pretty firm deadline.

I posted an episode with Andrea Jamison on Tuesday and last week I posted an episode with Maria McCauley.

This is the third candidate and final episode, with Lindsay Cronk. Normally I would post this next Tuesday, but voting will already be open by then, so here it is on a Friday.

I enjoyed talking with all of the candidates. My hope is by listening to all three episodes, you’ll have a better sense of their unique perspectives on the work that faces ALA in our current extremely challenging time.

Some links to things Lindsay and I discuss in this episode:

  • Lindsay mentions Fobazi Ettarh’s work on Vocational Awe
  • I talk about resilience as a property of the organization, rather than the individual. My thinking on this was catalyzed by this article:
    • Berg, J., Galvan, A., & Tewell, E. (2020). Responding to and reimagining resilience in academic libraries. Journal of New Librarianship, 3(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.21173/newlibs/4/1
  • We talk about the ALA-APA, ALA’s Allied Professional Association
  • Lindsay recommends Kate Woodsome’s Substack Invisible Threads
  • Lindsay also recommends the concept of critical hope, especially in the work of Kaetrena Davis Kendrick. You can learn more about Kaetrena’s work on critical hope here and here. And if you’ve got your own thoughts about critical hope, she and Ione T. Damasco are editing a book on the topic and the call for proposals is open.
  • I mention the poem Even in a Time of Intolerance by Rosemerry Wahtola Trommer, which I found through the newsletter of yoga teacher Vickie Russell Bell

You can find an AI-generated and not completely error free transcript here.

This podcast is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, YouTube music and other various podcasting sites (let me know if you can’t find it on your preferred platform).

I’d love to hear your requests or other feedback for moving forward. And please do reach out if you want to be a guest!

“There are still a lot of people who want to be librarians”

Please note: This is an anonymous response to an online survey; I do not have any way of contacting the respondent or verifying responses. Their answers may reflect good, bad, or middling hiring practices. I invite you to take what’s useful and leave the rest. If you are someone who hires Library, Archives or other LIS workers, please consider giving your own opinion by filling out the survey here

Current Hiring Practices and Organizational Needs

These questions are about your current hiring practices in general – the way things have been run the last year or two (or three).

Where do you advertise your job listings?

Linkedin, California Library Association, governmentjobs.com

Do you notice a difference in application quality based on where the applicant saw the job ad?

No

Do you include salary in the job ad?

√ Yes

Do you use keyword matching or any automation tools to reduce the number of applications a human reads while considering candidates?  

√ Yes

Do you consider candidates who don’t meet all the requirements listed in the job ad?

√ Yes

Does your workplace require experience for entry-level librarian positions? (Officially or unofficially…)

√ No

What is the current most common reason for disqualifying an applicant without an interview?

Lack of public library experience/customer service experience

Does your organization use one-way interviews? (Sometimes also called asynchronous or recorded interviews)

√ Yes

Do you provide interview questions before the interview? 

√ No

Does your interview process include taking the candidate out for a meal?

√ No, and I don’t think we ever have

How much of your interview process is virtual?

√ First round/Initial Screen:

Do you (or does your organization) give candidates feedback about applications or interview performance?

√ No

What is the most important thing for a job hunter to do in order to improve their hirability?

Practice situational questions.

I want to hire someone who is: 

trainable

Your Last Recruitment

These are questions about the last person you hired (or the last position you attempted to fill). This person may not have been a librarian, and that’s ok.

Think about the most recent time you participated in hiring someone (or an attempt to hire someone) at your organization. What was the title of the position you were trying to fill?

Library Assistant

When was this position hired?

√ Within the last three months

Approximately how many people applied for this position?

√ 25-75

Approximately what percentage of those would you say were hirable?

√ 25% or less

And how would you define “hirable”?

Library Experience

How did the recruitment for this position compare with recruitments in previous years?

More people with library experience

Your Workplace

This section asks for information about your workplace, including if you have lost positions in the last decade.

How many staff members are at your library/organization?

√ 50-100

Are you unionized?

√ Not unionized, but we do bargain/negotiate contracts collectively

How many permanent, full time job openings has your workplace posted in the last year?

√ 5-6

How many permanent, full time librarian (or other “professional” level) jobs has your workplace posted in the last year?

√ 3-4

Can you tell us how the number of permanent, full-time positions at your workplace has changed over the past decade?

√ There are more positions

Have any full-time librarian positions been replaced with part-time or hourly workers over the past decade?  

√ Yes

Have any full-time librarian positions been replaced with non-librarian, lower paid staff positions over the past decade?   

√ No

Is librarianship a dying profession?

√ No

Why or why not?

There are still a lot of people who want to be librarians

Demographics

This section asks for information about you specifically.

What part of the world are you in?

√ Western US (including Alaska, Hawaii and Pacific Northwest)

What’s your region like?

√ Suburban area

What type of institution do you hire for (check all that apply):

√ Public Library 

What type(s) of LIS professionals do you hire? 

Programming and Collection Management

Are you a librarian?

√ Yes

Are you now or have you ever been: 

√ A hiring manager (you are hiring people that you will directly or indirectly supervise)

#25 #books #GLAMJobs #Librarian #librarians #libraries #Library #libraryHiring #libraryInterview #libraryJobs #libraryWork #LISCareers #lisJobs

“pay was not enough to justify childcare”

Please note: this is an anonymous response to an online survey; I do not have any way of contacting the respondent or verifying responses. Their answers may reflect good, bad, or middling job searching practices. I invite you to take what’s useful and leave the rest.

Your Demographics and Search Parameters

How long have you been job hunting?

√ Less than six months

Why are you job hunting?   

√ I’m unemployed,

√ Looking for more money

Where do you look for open positions?  

ALA Joblist, usajob.gov, state emoployment website, local library website

What position level are you looking for?  

√ Entry level,

√ Clerk/Library Assistant

What type(s) of organization are you looking in? 

√ Academic library,

√ Archives,

√ Public library,

√ Special library

What part of the world are you in?

√ Western US (including Pacific Northwest)

What’s your region like? 

√ Urban area

Are you willing/able to move for employment? 

√ No

What are the top three things you’re looking for in a job?

Pay, flexible schedule, training opportunity

What steps, actions, or attributes are most important for employers to take to sell you on the job?  

√ Pay well,

√ Funding professional development,

√ Prioritizing work-life balance

Do you expect to see the salary range listed in a job ad?

√ Yes, and it’s a red flag when it’s not

Other than not listing a salary range, are there other “red flags” that would prevent you from applying to a job?

warning about potentially dangerous patrons, environment, etc.

The Process

How much time do you spend preparing an application packet?

too much time. days

How do you prefer to communicate with potential employers?

√ Email

When would you like potential employers to contact you? 

√ To acknowledge my application,

√ To tell me if the search is at the interview stage, even if I have not been selected,

√ Once the position has been filled, even if it’s not me

How long do you expect an organization’s application process to take, from the point you submit your documents to the point of either an offer or rejection?

one month

How do you prepare for interviews?

read sample questions and answers, practice or rehearse in head,

What are your most hated interview questions, and why?

what is your worst weakness or quality?

During your current search, have you had any of the following experiences:

  • Submitted an application and got no response √ Happened more than once
  • Had an interview and never heard back √ Not Applicable
  • Interviewed for a job where an internal candidate was eventually chosen √ Not Applicable
  • Asked for an accommodation for a disability √ Not Applicable
  • Withdrawn an application before the offer stage √ Not Applicable
  • Turned down an offer √ Happened once

If you’ve turned down an offer (or offers), why?

pay was not enough to justify childcare

You and Your Well-Being

How are you doing, generally?

√ I’m somewhat depressed,

√ I’m energized,

√ I feel alone in my search

Job Hunting Post Graduate School 

If you have an MLIS or other graduate level degree in a LIS field, what year did you graduate? (Or what year do you anticipate graduating?)

2009

When did you start your first job search for a “professional” position (or other position that utilized your degree)?

√ After graduating with my MLIS/other LIS degree

In relation to your graduation, when did you find your first “professional” position?

√ Hasn’t happened yet – I’m still looking

What kind of work was your first post-graduation professional position? 

√ N/A – hasn’t happened yet

“my best advice if you’re having trouble breaking into the profession is to get some kind of library job”

Please note: This is an anonymous response to an online survey; I do not have any way of contacting the respondent or verifying responses. Their answers may reflect good, bad, or middling hiring practices. I invite you to take what’s useful and leave the rest. If you are someone who hires Library, Archives or other LIS workers, please consider giving your own opinion by filling out the survey here

Current Hiring Practices and Organizational Needs

These questions are about your current hiring practices in general – the way things have been run the last year or two (or three).

Where do you advertise your job listings?

Depends on the level.  Paraprofessional just on internal site.  Professional on state association site and sometimes ALA.

Do you notice a difference in application quality based on where the applicant saw the job ad?

Sometimes

Do you include salary in the job ad?

√ Yes

Do you use keyword matching or any automation tools to reduce the number of applications a human reads while considering candidates?  

√ Other: City HR handles all this so I don’t know.

Do you consider candidates who don’t meet all the requirements listed in the job ad?

√ No

Does your workplace require experience for entry-level librarian positions? (Officially or unofficially…)

√ Other: Yes, but not necessarily library experience.

What is the current most common reason for disqualifying an applicant without an interview?

Does not meet basic criteria.  No MLIS if professional, no relevant experience for para.

Does your organization use one-way interviews? (Sometimes also called asynchronous or recorded interviews)

√ No

Do you provide interview questions before the interview? 

√ No

Does your interview process include taking the candidate out for a meal?

√ Other: I think they do this for director level and director’s direct reports, but not for anything I’ve ever hired.

How much of your interview process is virtual?

√ Other: Only virtual if candidate is not local

Do you (or does your organization) give candidates feedback about applications or interview performance?

√ Other: City HR will provide copies of the selection comment form for the candidate.  It’s not really very helpful.

What is the most important thing for a job hunter to do in order to improve their hirability?

Fill out the application completely.  Our process is driven by the city, and we cannot evaluate candidates based on their resume.  Job duties section in the application is KEY.

I want to hire someone who is: 

flexible

Is there anything else you’d like to say about hiring practices at your organization or in current trends?

I’m not a fan of the trend I see some places of deprofessionalizing the librarian job titles.  I think the MLIS means something.

Your Last Recruitment

These are questions about the last person you hired (or the last position you attempted to fill). This person may not have been a librarian, and that’s ok.

Think about the most recent time you participated in hiring someone (or an attempt to hire someone) at your organization. What was the title of the position you were trying to fill?

Library Services Supervisor

When was this position hired?

√ Within the last three months

Approximately how many people applied for this position?

√ 25-75

Approximately what percentage of those would you say were hirable?

√ 26-50%

And how would you define “hirable”?

Met minimum quals.

How did the recruitment for this position compare with recruitments in previous years?

I’ve never hired this position before, so unable to judge.

Your Workplace

This section asks for information about your workplace, including if you have lost positions in the last decade.

How many staff members are at your library/organization?

√ 200+

Are you unionized?

√ No

How many permanent, full time job openings has your workplace posted in the last year?

√ 7 or more

How many permanent, full time librarian (or other “professional” level) jobs has your workplace posted in the last year?

√ 7 or more

Can you tell us how the number of permanent, full-time positions at your workplace has changed over the past decade?

√ There are the same number of positions

Have any full-time librarian positions been replaced with part-time or hourly workers over the past decade?  

√ Other: We are in the process of increasing the number of librarians, so our trend is the other way – paraprofessional positions are being replaced by librarians.

Have any full-time librarian positions been replaced with non-librarian, lower paid staff positions over the past decade?   

√ No

Is librarianship a dying profession?

√ No

Why or why not?

The expertise of librarians is still needed.  Librarianship is a CHANGING profession.

Demographics

This section asks for information about you specifically.

What part of the world are you in?

√ Mid-Atlantic US

What’s your region like?

√ Urban area

What type of institution do you hire for (check all that apply):

√ Public Library 

What type(s) of LIS professionals do you hire? 

I personally hire programming librarians and managers.

Are you a librarian?

√ Yes

Are you now or have you ever been: 

√ A hiring manager (you are hiring people that you will directly or indirectly supervise), 

√ A member of a hiring or search committee

Do you have any other comments, for job hunters, other people who hire, about the survey, or for Emily (the survey author)?

For job hunters with MLIS and no experience, my best advice if you’re having trouble breaking into the profession is to get some kind of library job.  I had years of paraprofessional experience including supervisory and my first professional job after getting my MLIS was as a branch manager. Degree is great. Degree + experience puts you above the crowd. 

#25 #books #GLAMJobs #Librarian #librarians #libraries #Library #libraryHiring #libraryInterview #libraryJobs #libraryWork #LISCareers #lisJobs

Researcher’s Corner: How could the Library and Information Studies curriculum better prepare graduates to address equity, diversity, and inclusion issues in their workplace?

In this installment of the Researcher’s Corner, I’m pleased to be able to share this piece by Alison Hicks. This UK researcher shares some of the process and results from a study about how library school prepares (or doesn’t prepare) students for EDI work. This post may be particularly of interest to those of you who participate in decision making about curriculum for LIS programs.

If you’d like to read more, see the following citation:

Drewry, C., Matsuno, S., Hicks, A., & Inskip, C. (2024). How could the Library and Information Studies curriculum better prepare graduates to address equity, diversity and inclusion issues in their workplace? Journal of Information Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515241245960

If you went to library school, how did your Library and Information Studies (LIS) education prepare you to address questions of equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) when you entered the workplace? If the findings of our study into graduate preparedness are anything to go by, your answer is probably mixed, with participants noting the presence of some effective pedagogical strategies in their professional education alongside notable gaps in provision. The wish to address these oversights, as well as to develop more meaningful ways of engaging with structural anti-oppressive work, provided the original motivation for our article. To this, we would also add the desire to continue challenging narratives that position diversity as a problem to be ‘solved’ instead of interrogating the “systemic character of racial domination” (Hudson, 2017, p.17) and recognising the role that “white-centred thinking” plays in perpetuating privilege and inequality (Hathcock, 2015).

The site for our research was University College, London (UCL). Home to the UK’s first school of librarianship, the MA programme in LIS is located in one of the UK’s most multicultural and diverse cities. Our recent ALA accreditation meant that it was even more important that we foregrounded critical approaches to information challenges within our curriculum. To this end, we worked with campus career services to survey graduates of our MA programme about 1) the inclusion of EDI topics within their graduate education and 2) EDI-related activities that they are engaged with in the workplace. Recognising that EDI is “maddeningly vague” (Hudson, 2017, p.6), we defined the term as referring to “the ways in which inclusion and equitable treatment of diverse individuals are practiced and promoted within an organisation.” We also highlighted how the UK Equality Act of 2010 establishes protected characteristics as referring to age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation.

We received 59 valid responses (8% response rate) to our questionnaire, which was open for 6 weeks. The majority of responses were from Europe, including the UK (79%), and the most common decade of qualification was 2011-2020 (47%). Roughly a third of respondents indicated that they identified with the UK Equality Act protected characteristics, although only one respondent selected Race or Ethnicity. This under-representation of certain demographics created notable limitations to our research. The generalisability of our study was also constrained by the focus on graduates from one UK-based LIS programme; outdated alumni contact details may further have focused attention on the responses of more recent graduates. 

Analysis of the questionnaire’s open-ended responses, which we coded individually before jointly establishing the final coding structure, revealed insight into what participants considered to be effective pedagogical strategies for EDI-focused work. Drawing on personal identity or experiences of marginalisation, for example, were seen to be useful ways to encourage learning in this area, with participants indicating that becoming a manager, leading EDI sessions, or becoming responsible for legislation, had created the most insightful educational experiences to date. For others, it was working together that proved to be most impactful, whether in a professional association or with sympathetic allies. Providing emotional support for people who felt isolated in the field, community building was also seen to be particularly useful when it was backed up by library management who could effect structural change. Participants further talked of the value of embedding EDI throughout educational work, rather than seeing it as a tacked on addition. These suggestions provided useful guidance for how our LIS curriculum could be reviewed. 

At the same time, findings also revealed several problematic gaps in the provision of an EDI focused curriculum. Modules focused on management and leadership were pulled out as one area where LIS education could be enhanced, including through the need to incorporate knowledge of inclusive hiring into teaching material, as well as modelling how EDI could be embedded in strategic planning initiatives. A greater focus on positionality was also seen as essential, with responses indicating the difficulties that some people have in seeing layers of institutional inequalities. In effect, we noted that while some participants found it easy to talk about their EDI knowledge they seemed to find it harder to position themselves in relation to marginalisation or understand how their positionality impacts how they are able to move within the world. The tracing of ageist microaggressions, amongst other issues, within participant responses also indicated the need to engage learners with a broader scope of EDI work. These answers all suggest areas where our LIS teaching could be improved. 

Analysis of these responses has provided considerable food for thought as we take the next steps towards redesigning our LIS curriculum. We found that answers to our questions helped to provide the useful concrete detail about the design of EDI programming that is often missing from big picture literature, including educational standards, while also highlighting several areas of more urgent focus. At the same time, these findings also reveal certain tensions that still need to be resolved, including related to the labour of marginalised communities; while findings indicate the value that active listening, amongst other strategies, can play in allyship, we are also very aware of the dangers of perpetuating ‘racial capitalism,’ in which a person’s social or economic value is seen to be derived from their racial identity (Leong, 2012). We also note that the tenor of many responses seems to focus on retrofitting the profession or developing individual competence rather than challenging the systems of domination (Hathcock, 2015) that led to the original marginalisation. 

Since the publication of our article, we have continued to take steps to address the structural issues that lie behind many of the responses represented here, including through the hiring of new staff members. Our focus will now be on working with our colleagues in Archives and Records Management, who are already supporting a shift to more person-centred and relational educational models (e.g., Sexton et al., 2023), to meet our goals of preparing LIS graduates for diverse, activist, and anti-oppressive working environments. 

References

Hathcock, A. (2015). White librarianship in blackface: Diversity initiatives in LIS. In the Library with the Lead Pipe. http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2015/lis-diversity/

Hudson, D. J. (2017). On” diversity” as anti-racism in library and information studies: A critique. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies, 1(1)

Leong, N. (2012). Racial capitalism. Harvard Law Review, 126, 2151-2226. 

Sexton, A., Shepherd, E., & Duff, W. (2023). Relational and person-centred approaches to archival practice and education. The Journal of Community Informatics, 19(1), 3-22.

Alison Hicks is an Associate Professor in the Department of Information Studies at UCL, the UK’s first school of librarianship.

A librarian for ten years, Alison’s research agenda centres on information literacy, risk and transition within academic, health, everyday and work contexts. Alison is also a committed advocate for critical LIS teaching.

 

Please note: this is an anonymous response to an online survey; I do not have any way of contacting the respondent or verifying responses. Their answers may reflect good, bad, or middling job searching practices. I invite you to take what’s useful and leave the rest.

Your Demographics and Search Parameters

How long have you been job hunting?

√ Less than six months

Why are you job hunting?   

√ Looking for more money, 

√ Looking for remote/virtual work (or at least hybrid)

Where do you look for open positions?  

We here get money list, archivesgig

What position level are you looking for?  

√ Entry level, 

√ Requiring at least two years of experience, 

√ Supervisory

What type(s) of organization are you looking in? 

√ Academic library, 

√ Archives

What part of the world are you in?

√ Other: Urban areas in states that aren’t actively pursuing anti-trans legislation

What’s your region like? 

√ Urban area

Are you willing/able to move for employment? 

√ Yes, to a specific list of places

What are the top three things you’re looking for in a job?

Trans inclusion and anti racist, good pay, remote/hybrid work options

How many jobs have you applied to during your current search? (Please indicate if it’s an estimate or exact)

7-10

What steps, actions, or attributes are most important for employers to take to sell you on the job?  

√ Pay well, 

√ Having (and describing) excellent benefits, 

√ Having a good reputation, 

√ Funding professional development, 

√ Prioritizing EDI work, 

√ Prioritizing work-life balance

Do you expect to see the salary range listed in a job ad?

√ Yes, and it’s a red flag when it’s not

Other than not listing a salary range, are there other “red flags” that would prevent you from applying to a job?

Seems like 2-3 jobs rolled into one, seems like there is little support, no statement about DEI being everyone’s work, required or preferred qualifications seem oddly specific and targeted at a former employee that didn’t work out, bad feedback in the Green Book for Libraries, a trans exclusionary application process

The Process

How much time do you spend preparing an application packet?

Generally 1-2 hours, most jobs I apply for are similar enough that the application packet itself doesn’t take long

What are the steps you follow to prepare an application packet?

Update CV to reflect some language used in the job ad, updating cover letter to address areas the job ad particularly focuses on, reading statements and policies I can find on the library website, etc

How do you prefer to communicate with potential employers?

√ Other: Phone for good news and email for bad news, but email first to arrange a time for the phone call

When would you like potential employers to contact you? 

√ To acknowledge my application, 

√ To tell me if the search is at the interview stage, even if I have not been selected,

√ Once the position has been filled, even if it’s not me

How long do you expect an organization’s application process to take, from the point you submit your documents to the point of either an offer or rejection?

I’ve grown to expect that this will take about 6 months, even if I personally hate that timeframe

How do you prepare for interviews?

I do a lot. If they don’t give me questions in advance, I have a list of questions I’ve been asked at other interviews that I’ll practice with if they seem relevant. I’ll look at the job responsibilities and required qualifications to try to construct relevant questions they could ask. I browse the library and department website to read news items and look at policies and other information so I can ensure I don’t ask questions that have already been answered online, and so I can ask specific questions showing I did my research. I practice answering questions for at least an hour each day leading up to the scheduled interview. Sometimes I practice over a solo recorded zoom call or one with friends, just so it feels similar to the interview itself (this helps a lot with my nerves). I strongly believe in being prepared.

What are your most hated interview questions, and why?

I hate “tell us about a time when…” questions when they aren’t given in advance. I’m terrible at thinking of good examples on the spot, and I don’t think springing this question format on applicants is likely to lead to good responses you can compare between candidates. Most often I have to tell them that I’m bad at thinking of these on the spot, but that the way I handle communication issues or conflict or whatever is X.

During your current search, have you had any of the following experiences:

  • Submitted an application and got no response √ 
  • Had an interview and never heard back √ 
  • Interviewed for a job where an internal candidate was eventually chosen √ I don’t know
  • Asked for an accommodation for a disability √ 
  • Withdrawn an application before the offer stage √ Happened once
  • Turned down an offer √ Happened once

If you have ever withdrawn an application, why?

I got another job offer first, and needed to go with the guaranteed offer.

If you’ve turned down an offer (or offers), why?

I honestly did not think I would get the offer. I got the feeling that the supervisor didn’t like me during the interview because he was very gruff. When I asked the search committee what they liked about working there, they talked about the collection materials and none of them mentioned their coworkers or the work environment (which was a red flag), it would have been a pay cut and a benefits cut (less than half the vacation days I currently have), there were no remote/hybrid work options, and lastly, the entire department was white.

If you want to share a great, inspirational, funny, horrific or other story about an experience you have had at any stage in the hiring process, please do so here:

I am trans and a person of color. I applied for a very white liberal arts college that maybe had 1-2 poc working in the library, and the library website and committee spent a lot of time talking about how awful this was and they wanted to do better. I asked something about how their library supports the retention of trans and gender diverse and poc employees. They started excitedly telling me about how they have gender neutral bathrooms, pronouns in email signatures, etc. and someone mentioned employee affinity groups. They were very proud to tell me there was an lgbt affinity group, a women of color faculty group, and a men of color faculty group. When I pointed out that I was non-binary so having gendered affinity groups for poc wouldn’t work for me, they got very awkward and quiet.

What should employers do to make the hiring process better for job hunters?

Trans inclusive hiring policies, sharing questions a couple days ahead of time, no more meals or having meals alone during the interview, consider what meetings can happen remotely to shorten the day, consider if presentations are truly necessary for the position, post a salary range

You and Your Well-Being

How are you doing, generally?

√ I’m maintaining 

Job Hunting Post Graduate School 

If you have an MLIS or other graduate level degree in a LIS field, what year did you graduate? (Or what year do you anticipate graduating?)

May 2017

When did you start your first job search for a “professional” position (or other position that utilized your degree)?

√ Less than six months before graduating with my MLIS/other LIS degree, but still before I graduated

In relation to your graduation, when did you find your first “professional” position?

√ Other: My on-site interview was during finals, I got the job offer a couple weeks after graduation 

What kind of work was your first post-graduation professional position? 

√ Full Time, 

√ Residency

Did you get support from your library school for your first job hunt (and/or any subsequent ones)?

I had two professors serve as references, but that’s it. 

https://hiringlibrarians.com/2024/08/21/i-strongly-believe-in-being-prepared/