med-mastodon.com is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Medical community on Mastodon

Administered by:

Server stats:

363
active users

#chemicalanalysis

0 posts0 participants0 posts today
Tech news from Canada<p>Ars Technica: Leonardo da Vinci used toxic pigments when he painted the Mona Lisa <a href="https://arstechnica.com/?p=1978513" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">arstechnica.com/?p=1978513</span><span class="invisible"></span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.roitsystems.ca/tags/Tech" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Tech</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.roitsystems.ca/tags/arstechnica" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>arstechnica</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.roitsystems.ca/tags/IT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>IT</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.roitsystems.ca/tags/Technology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Technology</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.roitsystems.ca/tags/infraredspectroscopy" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>infraredspectroscopy</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.roitsystems.ca/tags/chemicalanalysis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>chemicalanalysis</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.roitsystems.ca/tags/x" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>x</span></a>-raydiffraction <a href="https://mastodon.roitsystems.ca/tags/artconservation" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>artconservation</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.roitsystems.ca/tags/LeonardodaVinci" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>LeonardodaVinci</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.roitsystems.ca/tags/chemistry" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>chemistry</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.roitsystems.ca/tags/MonaLisa" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>MonaLisa</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.roitsystems.ca/tags/pigments" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>pigments</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.roitsystems.ca/tags/Science" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>Science</span></a></p>
C. Anthony Lewis<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@FaithfullJohn" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>FaithfullJohn</span></a></span> I, very successfully, used the cut and weigh method to quantify chromatographic peaks. In an attempt to increase the mass of each peak (and therefore, I reasoned, precision) I tried photocopying onto OHP sheets but quickly found the precision was worse... I figured the thickness of the OHP sheets was less consistent than paper. But this was 40 years ago...<br><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/chromatography" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>chromatography</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ChemicalAnalysis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>ChemicalAnalysis</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/quantification" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">#<span>quantification</span></a></p>