med-mastodon.com is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Medical community on Mastodon

Administered by:

Server stats:

351
active users

#cs

6 posts5 participants0 posts today
amen zwa, esq.<p>When I was in <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/CS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CS</span></a> grad school, back in the early 1990s, <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/wavelets" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>wavelets</span></a> were hot in 3D volumetric CG—oh, those SIGGRAPH symposia on the topic. At the same time in <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/EE" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>EE</span></a>, loads of papers were published on their efficacy in DSP. Just about everyone in EE and CS seemed to have published at least one paper on wavelets. Fun times. But the current state of wavelet academic <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/research" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>research</span></a> seemed to have dried up.</p><p>I don't quite understand why wavelet transform has not supplanted Fourier transform in many <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/engineering" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>engineering</span></a> and <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/computing" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>computing</span></a> application domains, considering its estimable time-frequency locality and its prodigious multi-resolution analysis capabilities, compared to Fourier analysis.</p><p>I am but a mere "maths carpenter". So, what am I missing, I wonder.</p>
Jan Midtgaard<p>Michael D. Adams is looking for a post-doc to join him in Singapore on a project related to programming with fixed points:<br><a href="https://michaeldadams.org/hiring/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">michaeldadams.org/hiring/</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p>Should be a fun PL project and a good opportunity to work and live in a cool city. <a href="https://types.pl/tags/postdocjob" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>postdocjob</span></a> <a href="https://types.pl/tags/phd" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>phd</span></a> <a href="https://types.pl/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a> <a href="https://types.pl/tags/pl" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>pl</span></a></p>
Jencel Panic<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@jnpn" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>jnpn</span></a></span> There is probably an alternative universe where Brainfuck is studied and admired like Lambda Calculus by <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a> people</p>
Jencel Panic<p>I have long suspected that any language with if's and loops would be Turing complete, turns out there was a proof for that all along...</p><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structured_program_theorem" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structur</span><span class="invisible">ed_program_theorem</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/programming" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>programming</span></a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a></p>
Paris<p>Olga Carmona de plus en plus proche des Féminines du PSG –</p><p>Afin de concurrencer l’Olympique Lyonnais, les Féminines du PSG souhaitent se renforcer. Elles ser…<br><a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/Paris" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Paris</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/FR" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FR</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/France" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>France</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/Actu" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Actu</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/News" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>News</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/Europe" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Europe</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/EU" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>EU</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/actu" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>actu</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/ActuParis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ActuParis</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/Actualit%C3%A9s" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Actualités</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/Actualit%C3%A9sParis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ActualitésParis</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/canalsupporters" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>canalsupporters</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/Carmona" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Carmona</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/CS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CS</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/europe" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>europe</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/feminines" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>feminines</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/F%C3%A9mininesduPSG" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>FémininesduPSG</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/f%C3%A9mininespsg" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>fémininespsg</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/mercato" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>mercato</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/mercatopsg" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>mercatopsg</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/NewsParis" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>NewsParis</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/OlgaCarmona" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>OlgaCarmona</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/ParisNews" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ParisNews</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/parissaint" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>parissaint</span></a>-germain <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/parissg" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>parissg</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/psg" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>psg</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/psgfeminin" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>psgfeminin</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/realmadrid" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>realmadrid</span></a> <a href="https://pubeurope.com/tags/R%C3%A9publiquefran%C3%A7aise" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Républiquefrançaise</span></a><br><a href="https://www.europesays.com/fr/183302/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="">europesays.com/fr/183302/</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p>
@990000@mstdn.social<p>Holy shit can you imagine this seeping into your home and being exposed to it 24/7, even in light amounts?</p><p><a href="https://www.propublica.org/article/tear-gas-is-way-more-dangerous-than-police-let-on-especially-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">propublica.org/article/tear-ga</span><span class="invisible">s-is-way-more-dangerous-than-police-let-on-especially-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/CS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CS</span></a> <a href="https://mstdn.social/tags/TearGas" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>TearGas</span></a></p>
Tariq<p>Why is there no consideration of base cases ?</p><p>This is the textbook's explanation of "structural induction". The subsequent worked examples don't refer to base cases either.</p><p>Is it because they are always trivially true? I doubt this, myself.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/maths" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>maths</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a></p>
Tariq<p>currently learning about "structural induction"</p><p>my understanding (not 100% sure) </p><p>* We want to prove a property P for a λ-term E.</p><p>* E is constructed using a set of construction rules.</p><p>* So it must have been constructed from a term D by applying a construction rule.</p><p>* Induction hypothesis (IH) is that P is true for D.</p><p>* If we can prove that P applies to E by virtue of the IH and a property of the construction rules..</p><p>.. we've proven P is true generally.</p><p>Is that right?</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/maths" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>maths</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a></p>
Tariq<p>I've been writing up my attempts at the exercises from "Type Theory &amp; Formal Proof".</p><p>I've done chapter 1, and have almost done chapter 2.</p><p>I'm sure I've made many errors, but overall it helps me learn the ideas better than just reading, or doing the exercises as if no-one would read the solutions.</p><p><a href="https://type-theory-and-formal-proof.blogspot.com/p/contents.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">type-theory-and-formal-proof.b</span><span class="invisible">logspot.com/p/contents.html</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/maths" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>maths</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a></p>
Tariq<p>Is dimensional analysis the type theory of physics?</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/maths" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>maths</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/physics" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>physics</span></a></p>
Tariq<p>Is this correct?</p><p>Q. Construct a (simply typed) λ-term of type</p><p>((α →β) →α) →(α →α →β) →α</p><p>A. My answer</p><p>λx:((α →β) →α) . λy: (α →α →β) . x(y(z:α)) </p><p>My reasoning:</p><p>* the term takes 2 arguments and we don't have a choice of their type</p><p>* but I can't reach the output type with just those two arguments so I need a 3rd variable which I include as a "pre-typed variable" .. z:α</p><p>I just feel uncertain about crowbarring a pre-typed z into the expression</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/maths" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>maths</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a></p>
Tariq<p>Need some advice.</p><p>The textbook only has example of proofs with the "flags" all at the top of flag notation proofs.</p><p>But I think for this proof, the flag for `z` needs to be further down.</p><p>My reasoning .... because if `x` and `y` are instantiated inside the `z` scope, they can't be used outside it.</p><p>Am I right? Does scope not really matter in flag notation proofs ?</p><p>Attached image shows both versions for comparison.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/maths" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>maths</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a></p>
Tariq<p>To create proof trees like this in LaTex</p><p>I first tried the popular bussproof but then moved to ebproof as it was slightly nicer for labelling inference steps.</p><p>I actually tried another one too. Overall they all seemed pretty simple to use which is good - I don't often say that about software!</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/maths" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>maths</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/latex" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>latex</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/logic" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>logic</span></a></p>
Charlie McHenry<p>One of the great heroes in not just Apple history, but computer history, Bill Atkinson, has died at 74 from pancreatic cancer. <a href="https://connectop.us/tags/obit" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>obit</span></a> <a href="https://connectop.us/tags/RIP" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>RIP</span></a> <a href="https://connectop.us/tags/ComputerScience" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ComputerScience</span></a> <a href="https://connectop.us/tags/CS" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>CS</span></a> <a href="https://connectop.us/tags/IT" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>IT</span></a> <a href="https://connectop.us/tags/Technology" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Technology</span></a> <a href="https://connectop.us/tags/ComputerHistory" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>ComputerHistory</span></a> <a href="https://connectop.us/tags/Apple" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>Apple</span></a> </p><p><a href="https://daringfireball.net/linked/2025/06/07/bill-atkinson-rip" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">daringfireball.net/linked/2025</span><span class="invisible">/06/07/bill-atkinson-rip</span></a></p>
Tariq<p>Need some help.</p><p>-----</p><p>I know that to prove P ⇒ Q, I assume P and derive Q.</p><p>----</p><p>Now to prove</p><p>(A⇒B) ⇒ ((B⇒C) ⇒ (A⇒C))</p><p>I need to assume (A⇒B) and derive ((B⇒C) ⇒ (A⇒C)).</p><p>But I can't seem to make progress from (A⇒B) alone, I think I need to assume A is true as well.</p><p>----</p><p>Intuitively the statement makes total sense. But drawing the derivation as per image attached using elim and intro rules, I get stuck unless I assume A too.</p><p>Can anyone help clarify my thinking?</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/maths" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>maths</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/logic" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>logic</span></a></p>
Tariq<p>My second ever derivation in "flag format"</p><p>I'm using the flagderiv latex package which is actually very simple to use. It is already installed in Overleaf if you use that.</p><p><a href="https://www.ctan.org/pkg/flagderiv" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="">ctan.org/pkg/flagderiv</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/maths" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>maths</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/latex" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>latex</span></a></p>
nilesh<p>This was a mind-bending read! 🤯</p><p>Argues that intelligence might originate outside of physics and actually come from the platonic space of mathematical patterns.</p><p>For eg: the familiar "bubble sort" algo shows cognitive skills like delayed gratification and clustering.</p><p><a href="https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/5g2xj_v1" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/5g2x</span><span class="invisible">j_v1</span></a></p><p><a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/AI" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>AI</span></a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a></p>
Tariq<p>my first ever derivation in "flag format" !!</p><p><a href="https://type-theory-and-formal-proof.blogspot.com/2025/06/chapter-2-exercise-6.html" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">type-theory-and-formal-proof.b</span><span class="invisible">logspot.com/2025/06/chapter-2-exercise-6.html</span></a></p><p>update - there's a typo on the last line, I'll fix it tomorrow</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/maths" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>maths</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a></p>
Tariq<p>LaTex for Logicians</p><p>It seems to be a collection of how-tos for recreating diagrams / notation used in logic.</p><p>I may use it for "flag derivation diagrams".</p><p><a href="https://www.logicmatters.net/latex-for-logicians/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">logicmatters.net/latex-for-log</span><span class="invisible">icians/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/maths" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>maths</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/logic" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>logic</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/texlatex" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>texlatex</span></a></p>
Tariq<p>I've posted an exercise I'm not making progress on stack exchange</p><p>(I think) the core of it is how to handle "free variables" when deriving a type using the 3 rules - (var) (appl) (abst)</p><p><a href="https://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/173051/using-premise-conclusion-derivation-rules-with-free-variables-in-simply-typed-λ" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no" target="_blank"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">cs.stackexchange.com/questions</span><span class="invisible">/173051/using-premise-conclusion-derivation-rules-with-free-variables-in-simply-typed-λ</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/maths" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>maths</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/cs" class="mention hashtag" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">#<span>cs</span></a></p>