My new piece is a brief overview of why post-publication review is so important in science, and why you should always read research with a critical eye
https://gidmk.medium.com/post-publication-review-is-vital-for-science-42101380701d
@gidmk
Having a paper peer-reviewed is one thing.
But presenting the paper on Twitter and exposing it to "contrahents" is another thing, bc there seems to be much more incentives to spot out weaknesses. Can be toxic, but also much to learn.
Good story resonating with Adam Mastroianni's piece 'The rise and fall of peer review'
https://experimentalhistory.substack.com/p/the-rise-and-fall-of-peer-review
@gidmk Thanks for sharing this.
Only just now realized how important the photocopier was to peer review!